ArticleBMC research notes2025
Assessing CometChip technology for DNA damage studies in non-model species: distinct UV-induced responses in turtles and mammals.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting cancer in a non-mammalian model: genomic insights from lemon frost geckos.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Do turtles get cancer?Bioscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe evaluated the feasibility of using the high-throughput CometChip to assess DNA damage in non-model species. Specifically, we measured UVA-induced damage in fibroblasts from five turtle and four mammalian species with diverse life histories and cancer rates.
resultsTurtles exhibited significantly higher endogenous DNA damage than mammals but showed lower UVA-induced damage after both 2-min and 5-min exposures. At 5 min, bats exhibited the most DNA damage (21.3%), followed by mice (11.3%). Elephants showed intermediate responses (Asian: 6.49%, African: 3.58%), while all turtles remained below 3%, suggesting resilience to oxidative stress. Despite the assay's ability to detect DNA damage across species, several challenges emerged. Endogenous damage varied widely both within and between species. Differences in culture requirements between turtles and mammals limited experimental standardization. Additionally, characterizing species-specific responses is challenging, as multiple cell lines per species are often unavailable for non-model organisms, making it difficult to account for intraspecific variation. Addressing these limitations will be crucial for conducting robust comparative studies of DNA damage responses in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.