ArticleBMC psychology2025
Coping with moral distress: a qualitative study exploring psychological strategies used by healthcare professionals.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caring for the frail: a qualitative study in an orthopaedic setting.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Nurses' experiences of moral suffering: A qualitative interview study.Nursing ethics · 2026Article
- Delivering bad news in clinical practice: the role of communication skills and emotional intelligence among Polish healthcare professionals.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMoral distress is a specific type of stress related to the moral dimension of clinical practice. Literature shows that moral distress is associated with depressive symptoms, job resignation and burnout. However, few studies have explored the psychological factors that can modulate moral distress. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the range of psychological strategies employed by healthcare professionals (HPs) to cope with moral distress.
methodsUsing a snowball sampling technique, a purposeful sample of interdisciplinary HPs working in a large public hospital in Milan (Italy) was recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. HPs were asked to recall morally distressing situations and how they coped in their aftermath. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed through content analysis to identify psychological strategies used to cope with moral distress.
resultsWe interviewed 20 HPs (11 physicians, seven nurses, one midwife and one physiotherapist; 15 females; mean age = 50.26; SD = 8.19). Eight strategies used to cope with morally distressing situations were identified: Reframing the situation, Trying to modify the situation, Limiting own involvement, Tolerating the situation, Meeting and sharing with colleagues, Rejecting and withdrawing from the situation, Searching for alternative actions, and Venting. Typically, HPs used more than one strategy (mean = 4.1; SD = 1.14) and recounted learning and adapting strategies over time.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that psychological strategies used to cope with moral distress seemed partially distinct from those used for emotional distress. Future research is needed to explore possible distinctions between general coping and moral coping. In the future, identifying strategies associated with different levels of moral distress could inform and guide the implementation of preventive interventions for HPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.