ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Predicting anorexia nervosa treatment efficacy: an explainable machine learning approach.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to personalize treatment for eating disorders: A proof-of-concept study.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- An explainable predictive machine learning model of oxaliplatin induced peripheral neuropathy based on clinical data: a retrospective single center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- A person-centred and data-driven approach to phenotyping anorexia nervosa.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Evaluating the use of body mass index change as a proxy for anorexia nervosa recovery: a machine learning perspective.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a psychopathology with an alarmingly high mortality rate. The growing number of individuals seeking help, coupled with the limited resources of clinics, highlights the critical need to identify factors that can predict treatment efficacy. Machine learning (ML) techniques hold great promise in this regard. This data-driven approach offers an unbiased means to uncover predictors of specific outcomes, advancing the understanding and management of this challenging condition.
objectiveSix supervised ML algorithms (e.g., Decision Tree and Random Forest) were applied to develop a binary classification model predicting short-term weight recovery/stabilization in AN inpatients and identify the most critical factors influencing this outcome.
methodsChange in Body Mass Index (BMI) from admission to discharge (ΔBMI) was used as the outcome, allowing to classify patients into "improved" (BMI stability or increase) and "aggravation" (BMI decrease). Predictors included clinically relevant psychological tests and physical parameters. Scikit-learn features importance, and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analyses were used to investigate predictor importance.
resultsThe Random Forest model achieved an accuracy of 0.77, an AUC-ROC of 0.72, and a PR curve score of 0.88. Body Uneasiness, Personal Alienation, and Interpersonal Problems subscales emerged as best predictors. SHAP analysis confirmed these results at the individual prediction level. DISCUSSION: Results encouraged interventions focused on body-self experience in addition to interpersonal relationships, including body-swapping experiences and metaverse activities, respectively. This could maximize treatment efficacy, effectively allocating limited resources to achieve clinically relevant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.