Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457445›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2025

Olfactory responses of the variegated fruit fly, Phortica variegata, an emerging vector of the zoonotic eyeworm Thelazia callipaeda, to ecologically relevant volatiles.

Anna Laura Erdei, Magdolna Olívia Szelényi, Ferenc Deutsch, Balázs Kiss, Béla Péter Molnár

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Current understanding ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Laura ErdeiDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Chemical Ecology Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 23422, Lomma, Sweden. anna.erdei@slu.se.
Magdolna Olívia SzelényiDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Matronvásár, Hungary.
Ferenc DeutschDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Matronvásár, Hungary.
Balázs KissDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Matronvásár, Hungary.
Béla Péter MolnárDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Matronvásár, Hungary.

Funding

Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal FK 137579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe variegated fruit fly, Phortica variegata (Drosophilidae: Steganinae), is native to Europe and has emerged as a major vector of ocular nematosis caused by Thelazia callipaeda (Rhabditida: Thelaziidae), following the its introduction into Europe from Asia. Male P. variegata transmit these nematodes by feeding on tears of mammals, including wild and domestic carnivores (foxes, beech martens, wild cats, and dogs), lagomorphs, and humans. Understanding the olfactory responses of P. variegata to volatile cues is essential for developing attractant-based surveillance and control strategies, yet its olfactory ecology remains largely unexplored.

methodsWe used gas chromatography coupled electroantennography to measure antennal responses to synthetic and natural volatile blends. A comparative analysis was performed on the antennal responses of both sexes of P. variegata and its well-studied relative, Drosophila melanogaster. Components of the synthetic blends were selected based on the odorant receptor repertoire of D. melanogaster and established mosquito attractants, with the rationale that conserved olfactory receptors among dipterans may allow P. variegata to detect similar compounds. Volatile extracts collected using active carbon adsorbent traps were also tested on the antennae and analyzed using gas chromatography coupled mass spectrometry.

resultsMale P. variegata showed higher antennal responses to phenol, 3-octanone, and sulcatone than females, indicating olfactory sexual dimorphism. Compared to D. melanogaster, the antennae of P. variegata did not respond to several common plant alcohols and terpenoids. Instead, they showed stronger responses to compounds such as anisole, ethyl propanoate, butyl propanoate, propyl acetate, 3-octanone, nonanal, and decanal, suggesting that peripheral olfaction in P. variegata may be more tuned to microbial volatiles.

conclusionsPhortica variegata exhibits sexual dimorphism in olfactory responsivity, with males showing greater responsiveness to volatiles associated with host-seeking in other zoophilic dipterans, potentially guiding them to mammalian hosts for tear-feeding. Compared to D. melanogaster, P. variegata is more responsive to microbial and yeast-related volatiles and less responsive to plant-derived terpenoids, suggesting a foraging ecology linked to microbial substrates. The antennally detected volatiles identified in this study can be used as candidates for further behavioral studies to develop lures for vector management.

Indexed as

DrosophilidaeInsect VectorsSmellThelazioideaVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsArthropod AntennaeDrosophila melanogasterFemaleMaleVolatile Organic CompoundsChemical ecologyDipteran vectorGC-EADOlfactory responsesSexual olfactory dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID40457445
PMCPMC12131565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.