ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Views, feelings, and thoughts of first-time mothers regarding breastfeeding in public: a qualitative study.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe existing literature on breastfeeding in public has primarily concentrated on societal perceptions. However, women are the central figures in breastfeeding in public spaces. In particular, first-time breastfeeding mothers may feel incapable of breastfeeding or may have different perceptions of breastfeeding based on what they see or hear around them. Breastfeeding in public places may be difficult for these mothers. Therefore, it is essential to examine the perceptions of first-time breastfeeding mothers regarding breastfeeding in public to gain a better understanding of their thoughts and concerns, and to identify the factors influencing breastfeeding practices, particularly in public.
methodsThis study was conducted to examine the views, feelings, and thoughts of first-time mothers regarding breastfeeding in public. This qualitative descriptive study was conducted using in-depth, semi-structured interviews at Kahramanmaras Sütcü İmam University Health Practice and Research Hospital in Türkiye between May and September 2024. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. In analysis, the researchers followed Colaizzi's seven-step analysis method and identified and organized clusters of themes from the statements in the transcribed interviews. The MAXQDA software was used for coding and identifying relationships between themes and sub-themes.
resultsData saturation was reached with 34 participants. The analysis revealed four primary themes and 13 subthemes that represented the views, feelings, and thoughts of first-time mothers: (1) Confronting breastfeeding in public; (2) Challenging emotions related to breastfeeding in public; (3) Demotivating factors for breastfeeding in public; (4) Needs related to breastfeeding in public. The acceptability of breastfeeding in public varied among the participants, with negative narratives being more prevalent. A significant number of participants expressed a desire to avoid societal condemnation, viewing breastfeeding without a cover as improper. Additionally, certain culturally specific beliefs were identified as barriers to breastfeeding in public.
conclusionsThis study found that first-time mothers' views, feelings and thoughts about breastfeeding in public were influenced by the community's attitude. Additionally, the findings underscored the crucial role of culturally specific beliefs in shaping mothers' motivation to breastfeed in public. Therefore, proactive interventions targeting both new mothers and their environment are essential to change mothers' negative perceptions of breastfeeding in public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.