Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457418›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

A Professional Nurse Competence Scale (PNCS): Development and psychometric testing.

Jin Yun Chuang, Hui Yu Liang, Hung Da Dai, Tzu Yi Tseng, Shu Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jin Yun ChuangDepartment of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hui Yu LiangSchool of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung Da DaiDepartment of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tzu Yi TsengDepartment of Nursing, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Shu YuDepartment of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan. yushu@nycu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses face significant challenges due to the rapid changes brought about by the emergence of increasingly complex clinical practices. Although many instruments have been validated for measuring nursing competence, they lack an updated and more comprehensive perspective. We aimed to develop and conduct psychometric testing of a comprehensive scale for measuring the self-perceived competence of professional nurses in clinical settings.

methodsThis study employed an exploratory sequential mixed methods design to develop and validate the Professional Nurses Competence Scale (PNCS) in three phases. Phase 1 (development of the PNCS) included identification domains and item generation through literature review and qualitative focus group discussions, as well as content validity assessment. Phase 2 (application of the PNCS) included examining the item quality and exploring structures of the scale with 108 registered nurses (RNs). Phase 3 (evaluation of the final PNCS version) involved confirming structures through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), as well as assessing construct validity and internal consistency with 245 RNs. Twenty-two RNs were randomly selected for test-retest reliability of the final scale.

resultsDuring the first phase, the developed PNCS contained 68 items and tests for content validity. During the second phase, tests for homogeneity and item analysis retained 39 items, which were examined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The EFA produced six factors that explained 30 items. During the third phase, the six-factor structure showed an acceptable model fit in the CFA, satisfied construct validity, internal consistency and stability.

conclusionsThe PNCS was developed based on current clinical practices and perspectives. This scale could be used to assess self-perceived competence for professional nurses who require knowledge of clinical competence.

Indexed as

NursingProfessional competencePsychometricsSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40457418
PMCPMC12128518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.