ArticleBMC nursing2025
A Professional Nurse Competence Scale (PNCS): Development and psychometric testing.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of structured spiritual care education program on nurses' spiritual well-being and clinical competence: a randomized controlled trial.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Development and psychometric testing of the Competence in Work Ability Risk Management and Analysis (Comp-WARMaA) instrument: a methodological study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a competency assessment scale for nurses in reproductive medicine departments.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Latent profile analysis of emergency nurses' pre-triage competence and its associated factors: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses face significant challenges due to the rapid changes brought about by the emergence of increasingly complex clinical practices. Although many instruments have been validated for measuring nursing competence, they lack an updated and more comprehensive perspective. We aimed to develop and conduct psychometric testing of a comprehensive scale for measuring the self-perceived competence of professional nurses in clinical settings.
methodsThis study employed an exploratory sequential mixed methods design to develop and validate the Professional Nurses Competence Scale (PNCS) in three phases. Phase 1 (development of the PNCS) included identification domains and item generation through literature review and qualitative focus group discussions, as well as content validity assessment. Phase 2 (application of the PNCS) included examining the item quality and exploring structures of the scale with 108 registered nurses (RNs). Phase 3 (evaluation of the final PNCS version) involved confirming structures through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), as well as assessing construct validity and internal consistency with 245 RNs. Twenty-two RNs were randomly selected for test-retest reliability of the final scale.
resultsDuring the first phase, the developed PNCS contained 68 items and tests for content validity. During the second phase, tests for homogeneity and item analysis retained 39 items, which were examined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The EFA produced six factors that explained 30 items. During the third phase, the six-factor structure showed an acceptable model fit in the CFA, satisfied construct validity, internal consistency and stability.
conclusionsThe PNCS was developed based on current clinical practices and perspectives. This scale could be used to assess self-perceived competence for professional nurses who require knowledge of clinical competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.