ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025
Characteristics of
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predicting the unpredictable: prognostic and predictive power of FAPI-PET imaging in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Evolving therapeutics in colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Comparison between [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPURPOSE: To compare
methods39 pathologically confirmed PM patients with digestive malignancies underwent concurrent
resultsPatients (median age 62; 16 females, 23 males) included pancreatic (n = 17), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 8), gastric (n = 6), and colorectal cancers (n = 8).
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.