Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457339›Full record

ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2025

The Effect of Telemedicine on Preventive Medicine- A Case from Israel.

Limor Adler, Shiraz Vered, Menashe Meni Amran, Galya Zacay, Edna Bar-Ratson, Bar Cohen, Ilan Yehoshua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Limor AdlerHealth Division, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel. adler_l@mac.org.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9335-6596
Shiraz VeredSchool of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Menashe Meni AmranHealth Division, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Galya ZacayDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Edna Bar-RatsonHealth Division, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Bar CohenHealth Division, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ilan YehoshuaHealth Division, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

Kahn-Sagol-Maccabi Research and Innovation Institute Kahn-Sagol-Maccabi Research and Innovation Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreventive medicine is one of the core elements of primary care physicians' (PCPs) work. This includes screening for cancer (such as Mammography and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for breast and colon cancer) and also screening for chronic conditions (like bone density scans (DEXA scans) for osteoporosis). In recent years, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telemedicine increased dramatically. This study aimed to identify the rate of preventative medicine referrals and performance in individuals who mostly had face-to-face encounters compared to those who mostly had remote encounters.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study is based on the electronic medical records of one healthcare maintenance organization (HMO) in Israel. We followed all individuals eligible for at least one of the screening tests in 2020 and 2021 and evaluated whether they received referrals to screening tests (mammography, FOBT, and DEXA scans) and performed them. Each individual was assigned to the face-to-face group (more than 60% of their encounters were face-to-face), the remote group (more than 60% of their encounters were remote), and the mixed group, which included the rest of the cohort.

resultsFor mammographies and FOBT, the referral rates were lower in the face-to-face group compared to remote and mixed groups (mammographies: 27.3% vs. 29.8% and 32.9%, p-value < 0.001; FOBT: 55.6% vs. 60.3% and 58.7%, p-value < 0.001, respectively). However, for all three tests, the performance rates were the lowest in the remote group compared to face-to-face and mixed (for mammographies, 68.2% vs. 76.3% vs. 78.1; for FOBT, 44% vs. 56.8% vs. 54.3%; for DEXA 9.2% vs. 22.9% vs. 20.7%, respectively). A referral from the PCP increased the odds of performing the test for mammographies OR-1.55, 95% CI 1.52-1.58, and for FOBT OR-1.96, 95% CI 1.93-1.99.

conclusionAlthough PCPs referred their patients to screening tests in remote visits, the performance rate of individuals who mainly used telemedicine was lower than those who mostly had face-to-face visits. A referral for a screening test from the PCP increased the odds of performing it. Understanding individuals' health behaviors using telemedicine is crucial to maintaining adherence to preventing medicine.

Indexed as

Preventive MedicineTelemedicineAdultAgedCOVID-19FemaleHumansIsraelMaleMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesBone density scansFecal occult blood testsMammographiesPreventive medicineTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40457339
PMCPMC12128551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.