ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessing medical students' readiness for artificial intelligence after pre-clinical training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Medical Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Familiarity With AI in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Development of AI competencies within the medical curriculum.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence (AI) for social innovation in health education: promoting health literacy through personalized ai-driven learning tools - a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Effectiveness of an AI-augmented teacher feedback model in improving medical students' clinical documentation skills: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Clinical nurses as digital guardians: unlocking the key determinants of digital resilience in the AI era.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Current Landscape of Curriculum Development and Implementation in Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- What Are the Opportunities and Challenges of Using AI in Medical Education in Vietnam?JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Perceptions of AI-based tools among polish medical university students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly relevant in healthcare, necessitating healthcare professionals' proficiency in its use. Medical students and practitioners require fundamental understanding and skills development to manage data, oversee AI tools and make informed decisions based on AI applications. Integrating AI into medical education is essential to meet this demand.
methodThis cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the level of undergraduate medical students' readiness for AI as they enter their clinical years at Sultan Qaboos University's College of Medicine and Health Sciences. The students' readiness was assessed after being exposed to various AI related topics in several courses in the preclinical phases of the medical curriculum. The Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale For Medical Students (MAIRS-MS) questionnaire was used as the study instrument.
resultsA total of 84 out of 115 students completed the questionnaire (73.04% response rate). Of these, 45 (53.57%) were female while 39 (46.43%) were male. The cognition section, which evaluated the participants' cognitive preparedness in terms of knowledge of medical AI terminology, the logic behind AI applications, and data science, received the lowest score (Mean = 3.52). Conversely, the vision section of the questionnaire, which assessed the participants' capacity to comprehend the limitations and potential of medical AI, and anticipate opportunities and risks displayed the highest level of preparedness, had the highest score (Mean = 3.90). Notably, there were no statistically significant differences in AI competency scores by gender or academic year.
conclusionThis study's findings suggest while medical students demonstrate a moderate level of AI-readiness as they enter their clinical years, significant gaps remain, particularly in cognitive areas such as understanding AI terminology, logic, and data science. The majority of students use ChatGPT as their AI tool, with a notable difference in attitudes between tech-savvy and non-tech-savvy individuals. Further efforts are needed to improve students' competency in evaluating AI tools. Medical schools should consider integrating AI into their curricula to enhance students' preparedness for future medical practice. Assessing students' readiness for AI in healthcare is crucial for identifying knowledge and skills gaps and guiding future training efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.