ArticleBMC public health2025
Prevalence and determinants of inappropriate complementary feeding practices among children aged 6-23 months in Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Responsive Feeding Practices Among Caregivers of Children Aged 6-35 Months in China: Descriptive Study Involving Survey and Video Observation Methods.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInappropriate complementary feeding (CF) increases the risk of the triple burden of malnutrition, including undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, overweight and obesity. Chiang Mai, a major city in northern Thailand, is experiencing rapid urbanization and growing cultural diversity driven by tourism, which may influence CF practices. However, data on these practices remain limited, emphasizing the need for context-specific interventions.
methodsA cross-sectional study involving 1,122 caregivers of children aged 6-23 months was conducted between January and May 2024. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and 24-hour dietary recalls. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to identify factors associated with inappropriate CF practices.
resultsInappropriate CF was observed in 64.1% of the children. Dietary diversity increased with age, from an average of three food groups in infants aged 6-11 months to five food groups in children aged 18-23 months. Unhealthy dietary habits were more prevalent among children aged 18-23 months, with 38.4% consuming sweetened beverages and 47.8% consuming unhealthy foods. The key barriers included caregiver uncertainty about appropriate food textures (88.0%), food types (84.8%), and portion sizes (70.2%). The factors significantly associated with a greater risk of inappropriate CF included being a first-time caregiver (aRR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.05-1.31) and the caregiver's perception that the child preferred milk over solid foods (aRR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.17-1.49). Additionally, receiving feeding information from family or friends (aRR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) or from healthcare providers (aRR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02-1.33) was associated with a significantly greater risk than using unreliable online sources.
conclusionImproving CF practices requires focused support for caregivers, particularly first-time parents. Interventions should promote dietary diversity, address common concerns related to CF, and ensure that caregivers have access to reliable nutritional information through accessible and trusted communication channels. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of context-specific interventions tailored to local needs and caregiver characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.