ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025
Application of dental pulp stem cell-conditioned medium combined with deep cryopreservation of autologous cranial flaps.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone flap resorption and its risk factors following autologous cranioplasty with bone tissue bank-stored grafts.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Human Dental Pulp Stem Cell Secretome Restores Ischemic Stroke-Impaired Motor and Cognitive Functions by Reprogramming Redox and Inflammatory Signaling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Engineered Dll4-overexpressing osteocyte-derived exosomes enhanced bone regeneration by regulating osteogenesis and angiogenesis.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Editorial: Exploring the role of stem cells in bone health and regeneration.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Neuronal Differentiation and Exosome Profiling of Dental Pulp Stem Cells: Unveiling Their Potential for Nerve Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutologous cranial flaps preservation after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is crucial for cranioplasty, yet standard cryopreservation carries high complication rates 15-35%, primarily infections and bone resorption. These complications frequently necessitate surgical revisions and increase morbidity risks. Current methods lack standardized preservation solutions that simultaneously ensure osteocyte survival and prevent microbial growth. Developing integrated bacteriostatic and osteoprotective storage media remains an urgent unmet need to enhance patient outcomes.
objectivesThis study investigates optimized preservation protocols for autologous cranial flaps to mitigate post-cranioplasty complications, while evaluating the preservative efficacy and clinical translation potential of dental pulp stem cell-conditioned medium (DPSC-CM) as a novel osteogenic storage solution.
methodsDental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were cultured in serum-free medium to generate DPSC-CM. To evaluate the preservation efficacy of DPSC-CM, first, DPSC-CM was preliminarily evaluated by examining the cell viability after freezing and resuscitation. Second, a murine critical-size calvarial defect model was surgically established. Autologous cranial flaps underwent 4-week storage in experimental preservation solutions (DPSC-CM versus conventional cryoprotectants) were reimplanted. Postoperative bone regeneration was systematically quantified through high-resolution micro-CT analysis and histomorphometric evaluation of bone regeneration capacity. Given DPSC-CM's osteopreservative potential, in vitro analyses confirmed DPSC-CM's osteogenic/angiogenic capacity through proliferation/migration assays, osteogenic differentiation, and biomarker quantification.
resultsDPSC-CM demonstrated superior efficacy in cell preservation. Studies in a mouse model of cranial defects showed that the cranial flaps preserved with DPSC-CM in combination with deep cryopreservation (-196 °C) showed significantly better bone healing after cranioplasty than the other groups, and their neoangiogenic and anti-inflammatory abilities were also significantly better than those of the other groups. DPSC-CM was found to be superior to DPSCs in the osteogenesis of mouse embryonic osteoblast cells (MC3T3-E1 cells) and the angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).
conclusionsConsidering the superiority of osteogenesis and vascularization in vivo and in vitro, as well as the modulating of the local inflammatory microenvironment, DPSC-CM synergistic combination deep cryopreservation emerges as a novel strategy of preserving cranial flaps after DC. This multidisciplinary approach establishes a transformative framework for advancing autologous cranial flaps storage technologies, demonstrating translational promise through biological optimization of traditional cryopreservation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.