ArticleBMC nursing2025
The Chinese version of the emergency nurses' professional resilience tool: A translation and validation study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between professional resilience, self-efficacy, coping style, and empowering leadership among emergency nurses: a multi-center study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Psychometric Validation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 in Peruvian Nurses and Its Association with Stress and Empathy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA high level of professional resilience is a necessary quality for emergency nurses. It can help emergency nurses cope with work pressure and safeguard their physical and mental health. However, there is no specific tool in China to measure emergency nurses' professional resilience. This study aimed to translate the Emergency Nurses' Professional Resilience Tool (ENPRT) into Chinese and validate its psychometric properties among emergency nurses.
methodsTranslation and revision of the ENPRT was completed based on the Brislin Translation Model. Using convenience sampling to recruit 750 emergency nurses from 20 hospitals in Sichuan, China, to participate in the survey. Content and structural validity analyses were conducted to assess the scale's validity. The scale's reliability was assessed by Cronbach's α Coefficient, Split-half reliability, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsThe Chinese version of the ENPRT (ENPRT-C) included 34 items with scale content validity index (S-CVI) of 0.979. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors explaining 62.740% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.620 to 0.873. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicating that the revised 4-factor model was well fitted (χ
conclusionThe ENPRT-C has good psychometric properties and can accurately measure Chinese emergency nurses' professional resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.