ArticleBMC oral health2025
Effect of addition of hemp fiber and lignin-pectin-free hemp fiber to poly(methyl methacrylate) on surface roughness property.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of hemp fiber (HeF) and lignin-pectin-free HeF addition on the surface roughness of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) together with the Finishing and Polishing process.
methodsHeF and lignin-pectin-free HeF were used at a rate of 1%. This study uses three groups: Finishing groups (FG), Universal Polishing Paste groups (UP), and Lesk Polishing Liquid groups (LP). Each group has subgroups consisting of PMMA, PMMA + 1% HeF, and PMMA + 1% lignin-pectin-free HeF. 'finishing' and 'polishing' processes were applied to the prepared samples. Surface roughness was measured 'finishing' and 'polishing' processes using a profilometer. SEM and EDX analyses were performed in the characterization. One-way ANOVA evaluated surface roughness. P = 0.05 was set as the level of statistical significance.
resultsStatistical analysis showed that there were significant differences in surface roughness between the sample materials for PMMA + 1% HeF + 'finishing' (FG2) group in the 'finishing' process and PMMA + 1% HeF + Universal Polishing Paste (PG2) group in the 'polishing' process (p < 0.05). The mean R
conclusionThe findings suggest that hemp fibers increase roughness before polishing, and effective polishing can alleviate this, potentially reducing microbial adhesion and improving overall oral hygiene in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.