ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Using self-generated identification codes to match anonymous longitudinal data in a sexual health study of secondary school students: a cohort study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to (i) describe the procedures for generating self-generated identification codes (SGICs) in a prospective longitudinal evaluation of a sexual health program for secondary school students in Hong Kong; (ii) outline the matching strategies and processes; (iii) examine rates of successful matching and associated factors; and (iv) compare the responses of participants whose data could be matched to those whose data could not.
methodsA prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted. The SGIC comprised a 5-element code with 4 digits and 3 letters. A matching algorithm was developed to link baseline and follow-up data collected from students in Years 1 to 3 (n = 1,064) during the 2019-2020 school year. Matching success and associated factors were analyzed, and responses from matched and unmatched participants were compared.
resultsThe rate of perfectly matched cases was 49.06%, while 23.59% were partially matched, and 27.35% were unmatched. Logistic regression analysis revealed that male students (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.63) and Year 1 students (vs. Year 3; aOR: 0.56) were less likely to be perfectly matched. Compared to unmatched cases, perfectly and partially matched cases were less likely to have missing values and more likely to exhibit positive attitudes toward the sexual health program and related topics, such as the importance of sexual health, equal relationships, and condom use.
conclusionThe use of SGICs successfully matched approximately 72.65% of the study sample over a one-year period. These findings highlight the potential of SGICs as a tool for longitudinal data matching while underscoring the need for further refinement of code generation processes and matching algorithms to minimize data wastage and improve effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.