Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457272›Full record

ReviewBMC urology2025

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma - a rare kidney cancer with limited therapy options: a narrative review.

Milad Pashai Fakhri, Jürgen Serth, Jan Hinrich Bräsen, Philipp Ivanyi, Markus Antonius Kuczyk, Hossein Tezval

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milad Pashai FakhriDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Jürgen SerthDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Jan Hinrich BräsenNephropathology Unit, Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Philipp IvanyiDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Markus Antonius KuczykDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Hossein TezvalDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625, Germany. Tezval.Hossein@mh-Hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and is the most common form of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma in young women. Compared to clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), chRCC usually has an excellent prognosis, indicating the need for a reliable differential diagnosis, especially to distinguish it from eosinophilic variants of ccRCC. Another important differential diagnosis is renal oncocytoma (RO), which remains a major challenge even for experienced pathologists. The treatment of RO typically involves active surveillance, with surgical resection indicated if there is significant tumor growth. In contrast, for chRCC, the approach depends on tumor size, with either partial or radical nephrectomy being required. This review therefore summarizes key unique features and recent findings on this tumor, aiming to ensure a reliable differential diagnosis, thereby facilitating appropriate treatment selection and prognosis assessment. The histology of chRCC, including both for the classic and the eosinophilic subtype, is characterized by the appearance of raisinoid cell nuclei with perinuclear halos on microscopic imaging. In rare cases, signs of sarcomatoid, glandular and/or anaplastic dedifferentiation can also be observed, which significantly worsens the prognosis. The immunohistochemical marker phospho-S6 can be used to detect these changes. In addition to other routinely used markers such as C-Kit, CK7, EpCAM, CAIX and Claudin 7, we recommend the use of progesterone receptors as markers, as many chRCC express them and are thus progesterone-sensitive. This progesterone sensitivity could indicate that chRCC, similar to breast cancer, may represent a contraindication for the use of hormonal contraceptives. In addition to immunohistochemistry, molecular features of chRCC such as genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomic and proteomic alterations can be considered in the differential diagnosis. In this review, we therefore outline the most important established alterations in this context. In the treatment of metastatic chRCC, checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy and may represent a promising new approach for managing dedifferentiated, aggressive or metastatic chRCC. This review aims to present recent therapeutic advances and provide innovative approaches for future clinical treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansCheckpoint inhibitorsChromophobe renal cell carcinomaEpigeneticsGeneticsGrading systemProgesterone receptorPrognosisSarcomatoid dedifferentiation

Identifiers

PMID40457272
PMCPMC12131663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.