ReviewBMC urology2025
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma - a rare kidney cancer with limited therapy options: a narrative review.
Review in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with nodal involvement: A rare case report highlighting unusual molecular features.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Subtyping atypical eosinophilic renal cell tumours through integrated morphological, immunohistochemical, and mutational characters.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Large sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava: a case report on the challenges and lessons from a fatal outcome.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond angiogenesis: integrating ferroptosis and metabolic rewiring for next-generation RCC therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Renal cell carcinoma organoids for precision medicine: bridging the gap between models and patients.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and is the most common form of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma in young women. Compared to clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), chRCC usually has an excellent prognosis, indicating the need for a reliable differential diagnosis, especially to distinguish it from eosinophilic variants of ccRCC. Another important differential diagnosis is renal oncocytoma (RO), which remains a major challenge even for experienced pathologists. The treatment of RO typically involves active surveillance, with surgical resection indicated if there is significant tumor growth. In contrast, for chRCC, the approach depends on tumor size, with either partial or radical nephrectomy being required. This review therefore summarizes key unique features and recent findings on this tumor, aiming to ensure a reliable differential diagnosis, thereby facilitating appropriate treatment selection and prognosis assessment. The histology of chRCC, including both for the classic and the eosinophilic subtype, is characterized by the appearance of raisinoid cell nuclei with perinuclear halos on microscopic imaging. In rare cases, signs of sarcomatoid, glandular and/or anaplastic dedifferentiation can also be observed, which significantly worsens the prognosis. The immunohistochemical marker phospho-S6 can be used to detect these changes. In addition to other routinely used markers such as C-Kit, CK7, EpCAM, CAIX and Claudin 7, we recommend the use of progesterone receptors as markers, as many chRCC express them and are thus progesterone-sensitive. This progesterone sensitivity could indicate that chRCC, similar to breast cancer, may represent a contraindication for the use of hormonal contraceptives. In addition to immunohistochemistry, molecular features of chRCC such as genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomic and proteomic alterations can be considered in the differential diagnosis. In this review, we therefore outline the most important established alterations in this context. In the treatment of metastatic chRCC, checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy and may represent a promising new approach for managing dedifferentiated, aggressive or metastatic chRCC. This review aims to present recent therapeutic advances and provide innovative approaches for future clinical treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.