ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein as complementary biomarkers in differentiating viral and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in children.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-driven framework for differentiating pediatric bronchopneumonia from lobar pneumonia: a multicenter investigation.European journal of medical research · 2025Trial
- Can combined biomarker testing shape the future of primary care antibiotic prescribing?The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Pathogen Evasion of Humoral Innate Immunity: Coping with C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnostic efficacy of monocyte distribution width to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ratio in differentiating pathogen types in community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDistinguishing between viral and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children is crucial for guiding targeted management and antibiotic use. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of serum amyloid A protein(SAA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as biomarkers to differentiate viral from bacterial CAP in children.
methodsA total of 441 hospitalized children with a confirmed diagnosis of CAP were initially selected. Of these, 206 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 132 cases of viral pneumonia and 74 cases of bacterial pneumonia. Baseline data and clinical characteristics were collected. Respiratory pathogen detection and blood biomarker measurements, including SAA and CRP levels, were completed within 24 h of admission. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the effectiveness of SAA, CRP, and their combination in differentiating between viral and bacterial CAP.
resultsFever (body temperature ≥ 38 °C) was more frequently observed in the bacterial CAP group (95.9%) compared to the viral CAP group (75%, P = 0.000). Wheezing was more prevalent in the viral CAP group (40.2% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.022). CRP and SAA levels were significantly higher in the bacterial CAP group (CRP: 27.6 (6.5, 49.4) mg/L vs. 3 (0.7, 8.4) mg/L, P = 0.000; SAA: 190.1 (70, 297.4) mg/L vs. 13.5 (1.4, 48.2) mg/L, P = 0.000). The area under the ROC curve for CRP and SAA was 0.84 (0.78 ∼ 0.90) and 0.85 (0.79 ∼ 0.91), respectively. The cutoff points were 86.55 mg/L for SAA and 19.65 mg/L for CRP, with sensitivities of 86.9% and 94.6%, and specificities of 73.0% and 63.5%, respectively. Combining SAA and CRP detection with clinical symptoms increases specificity to 93.2% and 97.3% but reduces sensitivity to 31.3% and 22.7% in distinguishing viral from bacterial pneumonia. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that CRP was an independent predictor of bacterial pneumonia (OR = 1.098, P < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with SAA (Pearson r = 0.816, P < 0.001).
conclusionCRP and SAA are effective biomarkers for distinguishing between viral and bacterial CAP in children, with CRP demonstrating independent predictive value. The combined detection of CRP and SAA, along with clinical symptoms (such as fever or wheezing), significantly enhances diagnostic specificity but requires a trade-off with reduced sensitivity. This finding provides important evidence for the early precise classification of pediatric CAP and the rational use of antibiotics, but its clinical value still needs to be validated through larger-scale multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.