Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457244›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Sociocultural factors influencing women's adherence to colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review.

Ghaneshinee Sathiyaseelan, Syahnaz Mohd Hashim, Azmawati Mohammed Nawi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ghaneshinee SathiyaseelanDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Cheras, Malaysia.
Syahnaz Mohd HashimDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Cheras, Malaysia.
Azmawati Mohammed NawiDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Cheras, Malaysia. azmawati@ppukm.ukm.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer remains a leading cause of death among women globally, with breast, colorectal, and cervical cancers being the most prevalent. Despite established screening programs, low adherence rates persist, contributing to the continued high incidence of these cancers. Among the many influencing factors, sociocultural beliefs play a significant role in shaping women's health behaviours, often resulting in poor participation in screening initiatives. This systematic review aims to provide a thorough analysis of the impact of sociocultural factors on women's adherence to breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening.

methodsThis review focused on the influence of sociocultural belief factors on cancer screening adherence among women, hence PRISMA checklist was used, and the study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases without any time limit and after applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, 53 studies were selected for detailed review. Then, the quality of these studies was evaluated using the Mixed-Method Appraisal Tool, and all the studies were classified as low risk of bias and included for data extraction.

resultsMost studies included were quantitative, conducted in high-income countries between 2015 and 2024, primarily focusing on cervical cancer. Actual participation in cancer screening was more often measured than intentions toward adhering to screening program with individual-based theories were often used in the selected studies. In total, nine sociocultural themes were identified and clustered using the Health Belief Model and the Socioecological Model into five main themes and six key sub-themes. The factors emerging from the sub-themes of the theory were reported as the primary factors, which were further divided into key individual-level factors such as fear, worry, spirituality, medical mistrust, and fatalism, alongside influential factors from family and surrounding level factors.

conclusionThe review underscores that both individual-level factors, as conceptualised by the Health Belief Model, and broader contextual factors, as outlined by the Socioecological Model, play critical roles in influencing women's adherence to cancer screening. Cultural variations introduce unique sociocultural beliefs that may affect the generalisability of these findings. To improve adherence, interventions must address factors at multiple levels, ensuring a holistic approach to enhancing cancer screening programs.

trial registrationThe review protocol was registered using the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (ID = CRD 42024525634).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerPatient ComplianceUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansBreast CancerCancer Screening ProgramCervical CancerColorectal CancerCompliancePre-malignant FemaleSociocultural Belief Factors

Identifiers

PMID40457244
PMCPMC12128488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.