Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457232›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025

Morphological changes in polyester prosthesis geometry after open aortic repair.

Joseph Kletzer, Wanda Buechner, Martin Czerny, Roman Gottardi, Tim Berger, Aleksandar Dimov, Mario Lescan, Maximilian Kreibich, Stoyan Kondov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joseph KletzerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany. joseph.kletzer@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Wanda BuechnerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin CzernyDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
Roman GottardiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
Tim BergerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
Aleksandar DimovDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
Mario LescanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
Maximilian KreibichDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
Stoyan KondovDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg Heart Centre, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAim of this study was to assess geometrical changes of implanted Dacron grafts following open surgical ascending aortic replacement.

methodsGeometrical Dacron graft changes were analysed during the postoperative follow-up of 215 who received ascending aortic surgery between 02/2010 and 12/2020. Data was analysed using a linear mixed effects model over long-term follow-up.

resultsOne-hundred forty-five (67%) patients of our cohort were male, with a median age of 61 years 52-71.5). Most patients had a history of hypertension (79%). Proximal diameter of the implanted grafts grew at a rate of 0.251 cm (0.181-0.328 cm; p < 0.001) per year. In contrast, distal diameter stayed constant over time (0.019 cm; -0.048-0.135 cm; p = 0.366), while prosthesis length measured at the centreline decreased at a rate of -0.835 cm (-0.969 cm - -0.581 cm; p < 0.001) per year.

conclusionIn contrast to the native aorta, Dacron grafts seem to decrease in length over time. At the same time, there is a significant increase in proximal diameter. The specific dimensional changes, and differences to the nominal graft dimensions, should be considered at the time of graft implantation to ensure a durable platform for secondary aortic interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. IRB: 04/02/2021 (No. 20-1302).

Indexed as

AortaBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationPolyethylene TerephthalatesProsthesis DesignAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomePolyethylene TerephthalatesAortic surgeryComputed tomography angiographyDacron graftGeometry changesVascular prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID40457232
PMCPMC12128550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.