Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457173›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Class-balanced negative training sets for improving classifier model predictions of enhancer-promoter interactions.

Osamu Maruyama, Tsukasa Koga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Osamu MaruyamaFaculty of Design, Kyushu University, 4 Chome-9-1, Shiobaru, Minami Ward, Fukuoka, 8158540, Japan. maruyama.osamu.158@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Tsukasa KogaGraduate School of Design, Kyushu University, 4 Chome-9-1, Shiobaru, Minami Ward, Fukuoka, 8158540, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23-K21718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhancers regulate gene expression by forming DNA loops, thereby bringing themselves in close proximity to the target gene promoter. The human genome contains hundreds of thousands of enhancers, vastly outnumbering its 20,000-25,000 protein-coding genes, highlighting the importance of enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) in gene regulation. Supervised learning models have been developed to predict EPIs, often using experimentally validated interacting enhancer-promoter pairs and artificially generated negative samples. However, the lack of reliable negative samples presents a challenge. Current methods randomly select pairs from unlabeled data, leading to class imbalance and reduced predictive performance. This imbalance, where enhancers and promoters are unevenly distributed between the positive and negative sets, hinders classifiers from learning meaningful patterns. Therefore, constructing more reliable negative samples is crucial for improving the accuracy of EPI predictions.

resultsWe developed two methods to generate class-balanced negative training sets for EPI classifiers: one based on maximum flow and the other on Gibbs sampling. We evaluated these methods with the TargetFinder and TransEPI classifiers across five and six cell lines, respectively. The trained models were tested using a common negative test set. Our negative training sets significantly improved the prediction performance across several metrics, including precision, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that carefully designed negative samples can enhance the performance of EPI classifiers. Further advanced methods in generating negative EPIs should further improve prediction accuracy. The source code is available at https://github.com/maruyama-lab-design/CBOEP2 .

Indexed as

Computational BiologyEnhancer Elements, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticAlgorithmsHumansClass balanceEnhancer-promoter interactionsGibbs samplingMaximum flowNegative training set

Identifiers

PMID40457173
PMCPMC12131720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.