ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Changes in end-of-life care models among Chinese older adults, 1998-2018: an age-period-cohort analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applying the Timing It Right Framework to Caregiver Experiences and Needs in Adult Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs China’s older population continues to grow and unhealthy life expectancy gradually extends, the demand for end-of-life care has surged. However, research on end-of-life care models for Chinese older adults is still limited. This study explores the changes in end-of-life care models for older adults in China.
methodsWe utilized data from 22,464 deceased older adults in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) from 1998 to 2018. End-of-life care models were determined based on the primary caregivers and living arrangements of the older adults during the end-of-life period. Using a hierarchical age-period-cohort (HAPC) model, we analyzed the trends in age, period, and cohort for different care models, and examined gender and urban-rural differences.
resultsWith increasing age at the end of life, the probability of spousal care showed a downward trend, care provided by grandchildren showed an upward trend, care provided by relatives and friends followed a U-shaped curve, and there were no significant changes in the probability of care provided by children or formal care. The analysis of period effects revealed fluctuating upward trends in spousal care and care provided by children, while the remaining three care models showed downward trends. No significant cohort effects were observed for any of the care models. Regardless of age or period effects, older men were generally more likely to receive spousal care and care provided by relatives and friends than older women, while older women were more likely to receive care provided by children and grandchildren than older men. Urban-rural differences in both age and period effects exhibited varying trends across different care models.
conclusionsThe changes in end-of-life care models for Chinese older adults are influenced by both age and period effects. The sustainability of the child-centered care model, influenced by filial piety culture, is facing challenges, as the responsibility for end-of-life care has gradually expanded from children to a broader circle of caregivers. Future efforts should focus on developing a care model based on family caregiving, supplemented by formal care services. Additionally, older women and rural older adults are still at a disadvantage in accessing care services, and future policies should address this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.