Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457154›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2025

Eavesdropping and contagious alarming in bird communities.

Federica Rossetto, Gonçalo C Cardoso, Paola Laiolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federica RossettoBiodiversity Research Institute (CSIC, Oviedo University, Principality of Asturias), Campus de Mieres, Edificio de Investigación - 5ª planta, C. Gonzalo Gutiérrez Quirós s/n, 33600, Mieres, Spain. federica.rossetto@csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-063X
Gonçalo C CardosoCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, and BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6258-1881
Paola LaioloBiodiversity Research Institute (CSIC, Oviedo University, Principality of Asturias), Campus de Mieres, Edificio de Investigación - 5ª planta, C. Gonzalo Gutiérrez Quirós s/n, 33600, Mieres, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-6797

Funding

Fundación para el Fomento en Asturias de la Investigación Científica Aplicada y la Tecnología IDI/2021/000075Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation CGL2017-85191-PSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID2020-115259CB-100Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PRE2018-086304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls can provide valuable information about predator presence and therefore yield survival benefits. However, if, how, and why individuals react to heterospecific alarms is poorly known. If heterospecific alarms trigger a response, individuals might either stop their own vocal activity (acoustic suppression), to avoid being detected, or start alarming (acoustic stimulation), to warn conspecifics or deter predators. Here, we performed playback experiments with the alarms of 14 common forest passerine species and tested whether heterospecifics changed their acoustic behavior after playbacks and whether this involved suppression or stimulation. Moreover, we tested whether bird behavior was influenced by species-specific attributes such as escape capability, the propensity of being predated by raptors and carnivorous mammals, and the acoustic properties of alarms affecting detectability. Birds uttered alarms more frequently after playbacks than after silent controls, gave the same alarms as they normally use in response to conspecifics, and did not suppress their acoustic activity after playbacks. These results indicate that birds perceive threat from heterospecific alarms and are contagiously stimulated to alarm, rather than inhibited. Species with morphological attributes that promote agility and suffering low predation rates were more acoustically stimulated by heterospecific alarms, irrespective of the acoustic properties of the playback or their own alarms, indicating that the propensity to join into an alarm calling bout is mediated by predation risk. This study provides evidence for contagious alarming across species, for potential costs of responding to these stimuli, and shows a facilitative role of signalers within communities.

Indexed as

Escape ReactionPasseriformesVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsPredatory BehaviorSpecies SpecificityCommunicationInterspecific interactionsPasserinesPlayback experimentsVocalizations

Identifiers

PMID40457154
PMCPMC12615574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.