Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457110›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025

Pulsed-field ablation beyond pulmonary vein for persistent atrial fibrillation: efficacy and impact on left atrial function.

Wael Zaher, Lorenzo Marcon, Domenico G Della Rocca, Kathleen Thayse, Emmanuel Tran-Ngoc, Klaus-Richard Ebinger, Giampaolo Vetta, Luigi Pannone, Serge Boveda, Carlo de Asmundis and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Controversy: pulsed field ablation is the standard technique for all the candidates for atrial fibrillation ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Pulsed field ablation preserves left atrial volume compared to radiofrequency in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation beyond pulmonary veins.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wael ZaherDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA, Hornu, Belgium.
Lorenzo MarconDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA, Hornu, Belgium.
Domenico G Della RoccaHeart Rhythm Management Centre, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Heart Rhythm Research Brussels, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Kathleen ThayseDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA, Hornu, Belgium.
Emmanuel Tran-NgocDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA, Hornu, Belgium.
Klaus-Richard EbingerDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA, Hornu, Belgium.
Giampaolo VettaHeart Rhythm Management Centre, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Heart Rhythm Research Brussels, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Luigi PannoneHeart Rhythm Management Centre, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Heart Rhythm Research Brussels, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Serge BovedaHeart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Carlo de AsmundisHeart Rhythm Management Centre, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Heart Rhythm Research Brussels, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Gian-Battista ChierchiaHeart Rhythm Management Centre, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Heart Rhythm Research Brussels, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Antonio SorgenteDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA, Hornu, Belgium. sorgente.antonio@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, non-thermal energy for atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation that selectively targets cardiomyocytes with minimal to no risk of collateral damage. Among ablation strategies in persistent AF (PersAF), targeting sites other than the pulmonary veins (PVs) remains controversial, with concerns on improved success without increasing the risk of periprocedural complications and stiff left atrium (LA) syndrome. This study evaluates the impact of an ablation strategy beyond PVs using PFA on arrhythmia freedom and LA function in PersAF patients.

methodsThis study included 93 patients with PersAF undergoing first-time PFA targeting PVs and other extra-PV targets. AF-related symptoms, adverse events, electrocardiograms, and transthoracic echocardiograms were assessed at follow-up visits at 1, 6, and 12 months.

resultsExtra-PV targets included posterior wall (100%), anterior roof (50.5%), mitral isthmus (22.6%), anterior wall (36.6%), and right atrium applications (8.6%). No serious procedure-related adverse events were reported. At 1-year follow-up, 82.8% of patients were free from atrial arrhythmias. PFA significantly reduced A-wave velocity of mitral inflow and altered the E/A ratio but did not change LA compliance markers (e.g., LA strain reservoir and LA stiffness index (LASI)). LASI and left ventricular ejection fraction significantly improved from baseline in the PersAF > 3-month group.

conclusionsOne-year atrial arrhythmia freedom in PersAF patients after extensive PFA by means of a multielectrode catheter was high. Extra-PV ablation was safe, did not alter LA compliance but promoted a positive reverse remodeling with improved LA compliance and left ventricular systolic function.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAtrial Function, LeftCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsAgedEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationAtrial remodelingCatheter ablationLeft atrial functionPulsed field ablation

Identifiers

PMID40457110
PMCPMC12644242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.