ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
The LITTability study - evaluation of the applicability of LITT in a real-world cohort of glioma patients.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging minimally invasive laser and light-based therapies for glioblastoma: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Laser interstitial thermal therapy in pediatric neurosurgery: a prospective nationwide study on indications, safety, and early outcomes.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for High-Grade Gliomas: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications and Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser-interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive technique used in neurosurgery for ablation of epileptic foci and malignant lesions, especially for glioma located in regions that pose high surgical risk. Current research mainly focuses on maximizing the safety of the procedure and proving the non-inferiority compared to open resection of glioma. However, data regarding the current applicability in real-time cohorts are lacking. The goal of this study is to evaluate the real-world applicability of LITT in glioma patients, specifically focusing on those who had undergone stereotactic biopsy, and to define limiting factors. For this retrospective study, we analyzed n = 207 glioma patients from a monocentric stereotactic surgery database over a 5-year period (2018-2022). Clinical, histopathological and radiological data were assessed. To define a lesion suitable for LITT, a two-step approach was used. In a first step, predefined selection criteria were applied consisting of a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70 or higher, an ASA Score of 3 or less, MRI compatibility, and glioma presenting as a single or bifocal lesion. In a second step, the LITT simulation was performed with additional criteria consisting of at least 90% possible ablation volume, a safe trajectory with avoidance of vessels, and optimal lesion accessibility without brainstem involvement. Out of 207 patients, 137 cases met initial preselection criteria, while 36 cases (17.4%) were ultimately deemed suitable for LITT post-simulation. Common exclusion factors included multifocal lesions, irregular lesion shape, and size constraints. Among suitable cases, 94.4% had unifocal lesions. For 44.4% of cases, only a single catheter was needed, with the number of ablation points varying from one to twelve per trajectory. The average lesion diameter for LITT-suitable cases was 26.4 mm. Even though LITT offers a promising alternative for glioma not suitable for open resection, the current application is limited. Main reasons were due to lesion morphology and size. Enhancing LITT applicability could involve addressing constraints posed by lesion geometry and volume. Prospective studies comparing LITT with conventional resection could better define the subset of glioma patients who may benefit most, advancing the potential for LITT in clinical neurosurgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.