ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Computer vision for evaluating retraction of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Augmented reality in robotic urology: from 3D printed models to cognitive surgical systems. A systematic literature review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- ASO Author Reflections: AI-driven Personalization in Digital Medicine and Addressing Clinical Bottlenecks: Insights from a Prostate Cancer Application.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nerve-sparing step of prostatectomy is crucial for post-operative sexual recovery, and excessive countertraction on the neurovascular bundle (NVB) during retraction has been associated with adverse sexual function outcomes. Our objective is to utilize computer vision to quantitatively assess the degree of this countertraction to study its impact on post-operative sexual recovery. Sixty-four nerve-sparing prostatectomy videos were used to extract snapshots prior to and at the maximum point of retraction gestures on the NVB. Semantic image segmentation, conducted with the Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT), was used to label features such as the proportion of tissue grasped relative to retractor size and tissue stretch (measured by percent area increase and angular deviation from baseline). Supervised machine learning models, including Random Forest, Multi-layer Perceptron, and XGBoost, were then developed to predict the likelihood of erections sufficient for intercourse at a 12-month post-operative follow-up. Predictions were based on clinical and surgical gesture features (age, PSA, extent of nerve sparing, and post-operative Gleason scores, number of NVB retractions) alone and in combination with segmentation-derived features. One thousand one hundred four instances of NVB retraction were labeled. For patients with insufficient erectile function for intercourse at the 12-month follow-up, the mean angular deviation, percent area increase, and proportion of tissue grasped were 25.80° (SD 13.1), 41.81% (SD 33.3), and 0.310 (SD 0.093), respectively. In contrast, for patients with sufficient erectile function, these values were 21.07° (SD 7.4), 20.10% (SD 12.5), and 0.206 (SD 0.127), respectively. Integrating segmentation-derived features into the models enhanced predictive performance, with the AUC increasing from 0.78 (IQR 0.56-0.98) to 0.83 (IQR 0.63-1.00) for the Random Forest model, from 0.61 (IQR 0.35-0.85) to 0.74 (IQR 0.50-0.94) for the Multi-layer Perceptron, and from 0.70 (IQR 0.44-0.92) to 0.78 (IQR 0.58-0.97) for XGBoost. Delicate handling of the neurovascular bundle is crucial for better post-operative sexual recovery, and computer vision can provide an objective assessment of retraction on the NVB, offering insights beyond clinical and gesture features alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.