ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
MobileTurkerNeXt: investigating the detection of Bankart and SLAP lesions using magnetic resonance images.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The landscape of computer vision is predominantly shaped by two groundbreaking methodologies: transformers and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). In this study, we aim to introduce an innovative mobile CNN architecture designed for orthopedic imaging that efficiently identifies both Bankart and SLAP lesions. Our approach involved the collection of two distinct magnetic resonance (MR) image datasets, with the primary goal of automating the detection of Bankart and SLAP lesions. A novel mobile CNN, dubbed MobileTurkerNeXt, forms the cornerstone of this research. This newly developed model, comprising roughly 1 million trainable parameters, unfolds across four principal stages: the stem, main, downsampling, and output phases. The stem phase incorporates three convolutional layers to initiate feature extraction. In the main phase, we introduce an innovative block, drawing inspiration from ConvNeXt, EfficientNet, and ResNet architectures. The downsampling phase utilizes patchify average pooling and pixel-wise convolution to effectively reduce spatial dimensions, while the output phase is meticulously engineered to yield classification outcomes. Our experimentation with MobileTurkerNeXt spanned three comparative scenarios: Bankart versus normal, SLAP versus normal, and a tripartite comparison of Bankart, SLAP, and normal cases. The model demonstrated exemplary performance, achieving test classification accuracies exceeding 96% across these scenarios. The empirical results underscore the MobileTurkerNeXt's superior classification process in differentiating among Bankart, SLAP, and normal conditions in orthopedic imaging. This underscores the potential of our proposed mobile CNN in advancing diagnostic capabilities and contributing significantly to the field of medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40457030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.