Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457019›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

CleanSeqU algorithm for decontamination of catheterized urine 16S rRNA sequencing data.

Sung Min Yoon, Chang-Seok Ki, Ju Sun Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sung Min Yoon *Department of Laboratory Medicine, GC Genome, Seoul, 16924, Korea. ysm0503v@gccorp.com.
Chang-Seok KiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, GC Genome, Seoul, 16924, Korea.
Ju Sun Song *Department of Laboratory Medicine, GC Genome, Seoul, 16924, Korea. sjusun277@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contamination in low-biomass samples, such as urine, presents a major challenge for 16S rRNA gene sequencing, as extraneous DNA from reagents and the environment often obscures microbial signals. Existing in silico decontamination algorithms face limitations in accurately identifying and removing these contaminants. To address this issue, we developed CleanSeqU, a novel decontamination algorithm designed to enhance the accuracy of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data for catheterized urine samples. This approach is grounded in the principle that the compositional pattern of potential contaminant taxa remains similar between biological samples and blank controls. Also, the algorithm identifies potential contaminants based on ecological plausibility and custom blacklist. We evaluated CleanSeqU's performance using vaginal microbiome dilution experiments as a proxy for low-biomass urine samples and compared it to the Decontam, Microdecon, and SCRuB algorithm. CleanSeqU consistently outperformed Decontam, Microdecon, and SCRuB across various contamination levels, with superior accuracy, F1-scores, and reduced beta-dissimilarity. CleanSeqU improved specificity and positive predictive value by correctly identifying and removing a higher number of contaminant amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Furthermore, the reduced alpha diversity in the decontaminated datasets suggests more precise contaminant elimination. With its practical use of a single blank extraction control per batch and adjustable decontamination rules, CleanSeqU provides an efficient and scalable solution that delivers accurate microbial profiles. Our findings highlight its potential to significantly advance urine microbiome research by delivering more accurate microbial profiles.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecontaminationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUrineFemaleHumansMicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNAVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingBlank extraction controlDecontamination algorithmsLow biomass samplesMicrobial contaminationUrine microbiome

Identifiers

PMID40457019
PMCPMC12130503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.