Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40456999›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Artificial Intelligence Framework for Automated Facial Asymmetry Detection Using Key-Point Analysis and Neural Networks.

Shahab Kavousinejad, Yasamin Vazirizadeh, Mohammad Behnaz, Asghar Ebadifar, Hoori Mirmohammadsadeghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Data-Driven Approaches for Autism Detection: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Algorithms and Datasets.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shahab KavousinejadDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yasamin VazirizadehDentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad BehnazDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Asghar EbadifarDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hoori MirmohammadsadeghiDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. hoorimms@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate facial asymmetry assessment is essential in orthodontics, maxillofacial surgery, and plastic surgery. While minor asymmetry is common, severe cases often result from congenital conditions or trauma. Traditional methods struggle to comprehensively quantify asymmetry's extent and direction. This study developed and compared artificial neural networks (ANN) and Siamese neural networks (SNN) to detect facial asymmetry and determine deviation direction (horizontal/vertical). A dataset of 1200 frontal photographs, annotated by three orthodontists, was used. The MediaPipe model facilitated facial landmark detection and midline alignment. Two approaches were employed: (1) extracting features from facial landmarks and using them to train an ANN, and (2) SNN-based comparison of mirrored facial halves. Exploratory data analysis (EDA) was used to quantify facial asymmetry in both vertical and horizontal dimensions. The ANN and SNN performance was evaluated using accuracy, recall, and F1-score. The SNN outperformed ANN, achieving 97% accuracy and strong agreement with expert evaluations (Cohen's Kappa: 0.84 for asymmetry detection, 0.73 for horizontal deviation, and 0.80 for vertical asymmetry). The symmetry group showed 96.14% mean similarity, while the asymmetry group had 83.97%. The SNN's ROC curve yielded an AUC of 0.98, indicating high diagnostic performance. This study demonstrates the potential of AI-driven methods, particularly SNN, for reliable and objective facial asymmetry assessment in clinical settings. Future research should focus on expanding datasets and refining midline alignment to improve accuracy, especially in cases with vertical eye asymmetry.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFacial AsymmetryNeural Networks, ComputerFemaleHumansMalePhotographyArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkFacial asymmetryOrthodonticsSiamese neural network

Identifiers

PMID40456999
PMCPMC13103240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.