Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40456998›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Using Radiomic Features and CNN-Based Deep Learning in Benign and Malignant Classification of Vertebral Compression Fractures Using CT Scans.

Jong Chan Yeom, So Hyun Park, Young Jae Kim, Tae Ran Ahn, Kwang Gi Kim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jong Chan Yeom *Department of Bio-Health Medical Engineering, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6275-094X
So Hyun Park *Department of Radiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, 21, Namdong-Daero 774Beon-Gil, Namdong-Gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9935-2863
Young Jae KimGachon Biomedical & Convergence Institute, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0443-0051
Tae Ran Ahn *Department of Radiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, 21, Namdong-Daero 774Beon-Gil, Namdong-Gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea. ahntaeradio@gmail.com.
Kwang Gi Kim *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University, 191, Hambangmoe-Ro, Yeonsu-Gu, Incheon, 21936, Republic of Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9714-6038

Funding

Gachon University GCU-202401420001Gyeonggi-do Regional Research Center GRRC-Gachon2023(B01)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinguishing benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures is critical for clinical management but remains challenging on contrast-enhanced abdominal CT, which lacks the soft tissue contrast of MRI. This study evaluates and compares radiomic feature-based machine learning and convolutional neural network-based deep learning models for classifying VCFs using abdominal CT. A retrospective cohort of 447 vertebral compression fractures (196 benign, 251 malignant) from 286 patients was analyzed. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics, with Recursive Feature Elimination selecting six key texture-based features (e.g., Run Variance, Dependence Non-Uniformity Normalized), highlighting textural heterogeneity as a malignancy marker. Machine learning models (XGBoost, SVM, KNN, Random Forest) and a 3D CNN were trained on CT data, with performance assessed via precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy, and AUC. The deep learning model achieved marginally superior overall performance, with a statistically significant higher AUC (77.66% vs. 75.91%, p < 0.05) and better precision, F1 score, and accuracy compared to the top-performing machine learning model (XGBoost). Deep learning's attention maps localized diagnostically relevant regions, mimicking radiologists' focus, whereas radiomics lacked spatial interpretability despite offering quantifiable biomarkers. This study underscores the complementary strengths of machine learning and deep learning: radiomics provides interpretable features tied to tumor heterogeneity, while DL autonomously extracts high-dimensional patterns with spatial explainability. Integrating both approaches could enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinician trust in abdominal CT-based VCF assessment. Limitations include retrospective single-center data and potential selection bias. Future multi-center studies with diverse protocols and histopathological validation are warranted to generalize these findings.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFractures, CompressionMachine LearningSpinal FracturesSpinal NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesContrast-enhanced computed tomographyDeep learningMachine learningRadiomicsVertebral compression fracture

Identifiers

PMID40456998
PMCPMC13103165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.