ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Using Radiomic Features and CNN-Based Deep Learning in Benign and Malignant Classification of Vertebral Compression Fractures Using CT Scans.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using artificial intelligence for distinguishing benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures by computed tomography: a scoping review.International journal of burns and trauma · 2026Review
- Enhanced brain tumor segmentation in medical imaging using multi-modal multi-scale contextual aggregation and attention fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinguishing benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures is critical for clinical management but remains challenging on contrast-enhanced abdominal CT, which lacks the soft tissue contrast of MRI. This study evaluates and compares radiomic feature-based machine learning and convolutional neural network-based deep learning models for classifying VCFs using abdominal CT. A retrospective cohort of 447 vertebral compression fractures (196 benign, 251 malignant) from 286 patients was analyzed. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics, with Recursive Feature Elimination selecting six key texture-based features (e.g., Run Variance, Dependence Non-Uniformity Normalized), highlighting textural heterogeneity as a malignancy marker. Machine learning models (XGBoost, SVM, KNN, Random Forest) and a 3D CNN were trained on CT data, with performance assessed via precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy, and AUC. The deep learning model achieved marginally superior overall performance, with a statistically significant higher AUC (77.66% vs. 75.91%, p < 0.05) and better precision, F1 score, and accuracy compared to the top-performing machine learning model (XGBoost). Deep learning's attention maps localized diagnostically relevant regions, mimicking radiologists' focus, whereas radiomics lacked spatial interpretability despite offering quantifiable biomarkers. This study underscores the complementary strengths of machine learning and deep learning: radiomics provides interpretable features tied to tumor heterogeneity, while DL autonomously extracts high-dimensional patterns with spatial explainability. Integrating both approaches could enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinician trust in abdominal CT-based VCF assessment. Limitations include retrospective single-center data and potential selection bias. Future multi-center studies with diverse protocols and histopathological validation are warranted to generalize these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.