ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
High-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging Findings for Different Breast Fillers.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-frequency ultrasound is commonly used for evaluating breast filling materials and can be used to diagnose adverse reactions after breast augmentation procedures.
methodsBreast ultrasound images obtained at the Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College from January 2015 to February 2023 were analyzed and evaluated.
resultsA total of 595 patients who underwent breast augmentation procedures were included in this study: 195 patients underwent prosthetic breast augmentation; 308, autologous fat filling; 77, polyacrylamide hydrogel filling; 12, expander implantation; and 2, silicone oil filling. Ultrasound could reveal complications such as intracapsular rupture, extracapsular rupture, folding, fluid accumulation, and infection after prosthesis implantation. Ultrasound could also show pathological manifestations such as necrosis, calcification, and infection of autologous fat after autologous fat transplantation and displacement, extravasation, calcification, and infection after polyacrylamide hydrogel implantation.
conclusionsHigh-frequency ultrasound plays an important role in the identification of breast filler materials and the diagnosis of complications after breast augmentation procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40456995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.