ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Revision Rhinoplasty After Non-Surgical Filler in East Asian Patients: A Safe and Effective Surgical Approach.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecent advancements in non-surgical cosmetic technologies have increased their popularity for facial rejuvenation, particularly non-surgical rhinoplasty in the Asian region. However, variability in injection techniques, unknown injectable materials, and off-label use have led to complications, often referred to nasal "disasters," which complicate subsequent surgical repairs. Thus, safe and effective treatment strategies for nasal repair following non-surgical rhinoplasty are urgently needed. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study systematically reviewed patients who underwent surgical revision rhinoplasty in East Asia from June 2018 to January 2024. During a follow-up period of at least one year, postoperative photographs were analyzed, and patients were re-evaluated for symmetry, nose shape, and contour.
resultsSignificant changes were observed in the heights of the N, P, and T points, with notable increases in the T and P points. The length of the NT line increased, postoperative ROE scores improved, and the median VAS score was 2, indicating enhanced patient satisfaction.
conclusionRhinoplasty revision surgery that combines complete injection removal, costal cartilage transplantation, a nasal septum 'X' framework, rectus abdominis fascia modification of the nasal dorsum, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) to elevate the nasal dorsum can achieve good, safe, and satisfactory results for patients who have undergone non-surgical filler rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40456990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.