ArticleFood and environmental virology2025
Validation of an Optimised Method for Quantitative Detection of Hepatitis E Virus in Pork Sausage.
Article in Food and environmental virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment and application of a droplet digital PCR assay for sensitive detection of porcine deltacoronavirus.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is an emerging zoonosis that can be transmitted to humans through the consumption of raw or undercooked pork products. Several methods have been described to detect the virus in food, but there are few data on qualitative and quantitative performance characteristics. In this study, we have developed an optimised method for quantitative detection of HEV in pork sausage based on a combination of previously published protocols. The method utilises sample disruption and phase separation with tri-reagent and 1-bromo-3-chloropropane followed by RNA concentration with isopropanol precipitation. We validated the method for use on reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription droplet digital (RT-ddPCR). The 95% limit of detection and limit of quantification was 200 copies/g for both RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR. RT-ddPCR technology has previously shown promise as a more precise alternative to RT-qPCR. However, we found no evidence for improved performance using RT-ddPCR instead of RT-qPCR for this method. Additionally, we further verified the performance of the HEV RT-PCR assay using the WHO International Standard and Reference Panel for HEV RNA. Finally, we assessed different combinations of RNA concentration protocols and RT-PCR detection strategies. This showed that isopropanol precipitation of viral RNA was at least twice as efficient as magnetic silica bead-based extraction when an inhibitor-tolerant RT-qPCR detection strategy was used. In summary, we present an efficient and well-characterised method for quantitative detection of HEV in pork sausage. Such methods are valuable to provide high-quality data for risk assessments and food monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.