ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Metagenomic Analysis of Pulp and Paper Wastes and Prospects for Their Self-purification.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thousands of tons of waste accumulate, as a result of the activities of the pulp and paper industry, which is often stored in the form of dumps. However, intensifying the use of lignocellulose for more efficient bioremediation remains highly challenging. Therefore, the study of microbiomes with potentially desirable characteristics for the decomposition of pulp and paper wastes is currently an important task. In this study, a comprehensive assessment of the microbiota biodiversity of these dumps was carried out using high-throughput, high-resolution sequencing. In study 472 million high-quality clean reads assembled into 6,413,337 contigs with a total length of 4306 Mb, of which 3,633,174 open reading frames (ORFs) were identified. The core microbiome was composed of four phyla from Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Verrucomicrobia. Representatives of phylum Proteobacteria prevailed in samples. Annotation using the KEGG database in the Metabolism category resulted in 654,234 ORFs and 5138 ORFs encoding enzymes/proteins involved in degradation of lignocellulose which formed main pool of the wastes. By use of the created database, the search for lignocellulose degradation genes showed that genera Shewanella, Achromobacter, and Delftia covered significant part of the reads. The results indicate that the established microbiome of local landfills can be considered as an important source for improving lignocellulose bioremediation, provided that lignocellulosic fungi are sufficiently active. In whole, these new data can be used as a scientific basis to form an efficient eco-biotechnology for auto-remediation of pulp and paper industry waste.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40456950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.