Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40456906›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2025

Egocentric value maps of the near-body environment.

Rory John Bufacchi, Richard Somervail, Aoife Maria Fitzpatrick, Yusuke Murayama, Nikos Logothetis, Roberto Caminiti, Gian Domenico Iannetti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rory John BufacchiInternational Center for Primate Brain Research (ICPBR), Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. rory.bufacchi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6976-5368
Richard SomervailNeuroscience and Behaviour Laboratory, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Rome, Italy.
Aoife Maria FitzpatrickNeuroscience and Behaviour Laboratory, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-699X
Yusuke MurayamaInternational Center for Primate Brain Research (ICPBR), Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8943-1939
Nikos LogothetisInternational Center for Primate Brain Research (ICPBR), Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Roberto CaminitiNeuroscience and Behaviour Laboratory, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8396-2739
Gian Domenico IannettiNeuroscience and Behaviour Laboratory, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Rome, Italy. giandomenico.iannetti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-2068

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) PAINSTRATScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission) 2019SHZDZX02Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau E35CN31A21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body-part-centered response fields are pervasive in single neurons, functional magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalography and behavior, but there is no unifying formal explanation of their origins and role. In the present study, we used reinforcement learning and artificial neural networks to demonstrate that body-part-centered fields do not simply reflect stimulus configuration, but rather action value: they naturally arise from the basic assumption that agents often experience positive or negative reward after contacting environmental objects. This perspective successfully reproduces experimental findings that are foundational in the peripersonal space literature. It also suggests that peripersonal fields provide building blocks that create a modular model of the world near the agent: an egocentric value map. This concept is strongly supported by the emergent modularity that we observed in our artificial networks. The short-term, close-range, egocentric map is analogous to the long-term, long-range, allocentric hippocampal map. This perspective fits empirical data from multiple experiments, provides testable predictions and accommodates existing explanations of peripersonal fields.

Indexed as

Brain MappingEnvironmentNeural Networks, ComputerPersonal SpaceSpace PerceptionAnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalReinforcement, PsychologyReward

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.