ArticleNature neuroscience2025
Egocentric value maps of the near-body environment.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-related changes in front-rear anisotropy of peripersonal space representation.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- From peripersonal space to cognitive maps: An evolutionary perspective.Progress in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Embodied Neuropsychodynamics of the Relational Self Across Space and Time: An Integrative Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Multisensory integration in peripersonal space indexes consciousness states in sleep and disorders of consciousness.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Computational models of peripersonal space representation.Physics of life reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Body-part-centered response fields are pervasive in single neurons, functional magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalography and behavior, but there is no unifying formal explanation of their origins and role. In the present study, we used reinforcement learning and artificial neural networks to demonstrate that body-part-centered fields do not simply reflect stimulus configuration, but rather action value: they naturally arise from the basic assumption that agents often experience positive or negative reward after contacting environmental objects. This perspective successfully reproduces experimental findings that are foundational in the peripersonal space literature. It also suggests that peripersonal fields provide building blocks that create a modular model of the world near the agent: an egocentric value map. This concept is strongly supported by the emergent modularity that we observed in our artificial networks. The short-term, close-range, egocentric map is analogous to the long-term, long-range, allocentric hippocampal map. This perspective fits empirical data from multiple experiments, provides testable predictions and accommodates existing explanations of peripersonal fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40456906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.