ArticleScientific reports2025
Parameter extraction of PV models under varying meteorological conditions using a modified electric eel foraging optimization algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized parameter estimation of solar PV models using an improved red-tailed hawk algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Parameter extraction of photovoltaic cell/module models using starfish optimization algorithm with a secant-based objective function modification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel kangaroo escape optimizer for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic cells/modules via one, two and three-diode equivalent circuit modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dependence on photovoltaic (PV) solar systems has increased dramatically to cover the increasing progress of world energy demand. Therefore, accurately specifying the parameters of PV modules is essential for evaluating the behavior and impact of integrating PV systems into electrical systems. In this context, a modified electric eel foraging optimization (MEEFO) is suggested for determining the parameters of solar PV modules. The proposed technique incorporates three improvement strategies: the fitness distance balance (FDB) strategy, fractional-order calculus (FOC), and quasiopposition-based learning (QOBL). These strategies enhance both exploitation and exploration capabilities while helping to prevent local optimization and premature convergence commonly observed in traditional EEFO. First, the proposed MEEFO is evaluated via two benchmark functions, including the basic and CEC 2019 benchmark functions. The results are then compared with those of other novel methods in terms of accuracy, convergence characteristics, and overall performance. The suggested MMEFO is then employed to identify the parameters for the single, double, and triple diode models of various PV cells/modules, including R.T.C. France, PVM752, STM6-40/36, PWP-201, and STP6-120/36. In addition, various meteorological data, such as changes in radiation and temperature, exist. The simulation findings demonstrate that MEEFO outperforms other techniques and is a reliable and superior method for accurately estimating PV module parameters. The application of MEEFO yields the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) values for the considered single, double, and triple diode models of R.T.C. France. Similarly, for STP6-120/36, the RMSE values are 1.660060E-02, 1.66006E-02, and 1.66089E-02, respectively. Additionally, for PWP-20, the RMSE values are 2.425075E-03, 2.42511E-03, and 2.42510E-03, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.