ArticleScientific reports2025
Stability and displacement analysis of interlayered soft-hard slopes under seismic loading.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seismic stability analysis of cracked compound slopes considering soil heterogeneity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stability and displacement response of soft-hard interbedded slopes under seismic loading are crucial in seismic geotechnical engineering. This study investigates the dynamic behavior of slopes composed of alternating hard and soft rock layers using FLAC3D with a Mohr-Coulomb constitutive model and the strength reduction method. Through a series of numerical simulations involving varying seismic intensities (0.1 g, 0.3 g, 0.5 g) and structural parameters such as slope angle, dip angle, rock strength ratio, and soft-hard thickness ratio, the effects on slope stability and displacement were analyzed. Under static conditions, the calculated safety factor (Fs) ranged from 1.69 to 6.42 across 15 slope models. Simulation results revealed that as the strength parameter k and hard-rock proportion increased, slope stability improved. Under dynamic loading, the safety factor showed a decreasing trend with increasing seismic acceleration. For example, in No.5 model, the safety factor decreased from 6.42 (static) to 4.86 (0.1 g), 3.21 (0.3 g), and 2.10 (0.5 g). Displacement time histories showed that horizontal displacements increased significantly with seismic intensity, with Point E recording a peak horizontal displacement exceeding 0.2 m under 0.5 g. Meanwhile, vertical displacement differentiated between slope top uplift and foot settlement, indicating interlayer shear-slip behavior. The results provide theoretical support for seismic-resistant design of interbedded rock slopes, emphasizing the need for enhanced support in high-intensity earthquake zones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.