ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for Iliac vein compression syndrome in outpatients with varicose veins of the lower extremities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate a clinical prediction model for Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome (IVCS) in outpatients with Varicose veins of the lower extremities (VVLE), to aid clinical decision-making and early identification of high-risk patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 732 outpatients diagnosed with VVLE between 2014 and 2023. Independent predictors of IVCS were identified through multivariable logistic regression, and a nomogram was developed. The model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Four independent predictors for IVCS were identified: history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), history of vascular interventions, pain symptoms, and Clinical Etiological Anatomical Pathophysiological (CEAP) grade. The nomogram showed strong performance, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.79 in the training set and 0.74 in the validation set. of 0.79 in the training set and 0.74 in the validation set. Calibration curves confirmed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. DCA demonstrated the clinical utility of the model across different risk thresholds. A simple and cost-effective nomogram for predicting IVCS in VVLE patients was developed and validated. This tool helps outpatient clinicians identify high-risk IVCS patients early, supporting personalized treatment strategies. Further validation is needed, but the model holds promise for improving early diagnosis and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.