ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the heterogeneity in glioblastoma cellular mechanics using in-vitro assays and atomic force microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic insights into cellular deformation enable enhanced extensional-flow cytometry for label-free classification and sorting.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- The paradox of gold-liposome nanohybrids: the location of gold governs unconventional properties and drives cellular behavior.Materials horizons · 2026Article
- Review
- The effects of blast-induced traumatic brain injury on brain cellular mechanics and differentiation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Drug Repurposing in Glioblastoma Using a Machine Learning-Based Hybrid Feature Selection Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Heterogeneity phenotypes in recurrent glioblastoma: a multimodal MRI-based spatial mapping framework for precision treatment.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Biomechanics of the tumor extracellular matrix and regulatory T cells: regulatory mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options and prognosis due to its highly invasive nature and therapy resistance. Investigating the nanomechanical and pathophysiological properties of GBM cells will shed light on tumor behavior. In our study, we investigated the mechanical properties, migration dynamics, and cytoskeletal organization of T98G and U87 MG glioblastoma cell lines using in vitro techniques: atomic force microscopy (AFM) and electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS). While U87 MG cells are Temozolomide (TMZ)-sensitive and exhibit increased susceptibility to cell death and growth inhibition, T98 cells exhibit improved survival and repair in response to TMZ therapy. This study found that T98G cells are rougher, stiffer, and more viscous, while U87 MG cells are smoother, more elastic, and less viscous, leading to distinct cellular migration patterns. Such differences indicate GBM cell heterogeneity and have consequences for tumor development and resistance to treatment. The key differences of the nanomechanical, viscoelastic, and migratory properties between T98G and U87 MG cells, demonstrated in this work will help us gauge the diverse effects of different dosages of radiation along with immunotherapeutic agents, identifying the ideal radioimmunotherapy option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.