ArticleScientific reports2025
First national survey of terrestrial biodiversity using airborne eDNA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal dynamics in airborne fungi and allergenic fungal taxa across the United States.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Vertebrate biodiversity via eDNA at the air-water interface.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Network Analysis of Multidimensional Interactions Between Self-Regulatory Fatigue, Decision Conflict, and Quality of Life in Advanced Cancer Patients: Identifying Core Nodes for Precision Intervention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Passive air sampling detects environmental DNA transfer from water into air.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Airborne eDNA Reveals Resource-Based Assembly of Frugivorous Vertebrates.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Surveying tropical faunal diversity via airborne DNA analyses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Elusive tropical forest canopy diversity revealed through environmental DNA contained in rainwater.Science advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Near real-time data across taxa are necessary for quantifying biodiversity at regional to continental scales and evaluating conservation measures. Yet, standardized methods and globally distributed infrastructure are still lacking. In this study, we conducted the first national survey of terrestrial biodiversity using a metabarcoding approach on airborne environmental DNA collected by a national ambient air quality monitoring network. Our goal was to perform a multi-taxonomic biodiversity assessment at a national scale, compare detections with those of another large-scale monitoring approach (citizen sciences) and estimate a tentative minimum eDNA transportation distance. We identified over 1,100 taxa, including vertebrates, invertebrates, protists, fungi and plants covering a wide range of life history traits and ecological niches. Citizen science and eDNA detections were complementary, with eDNA better mapping less charismatic and difficult to spot taxa, demonstrating its potential to align with global conservation goals. Airborne eDNA signals were relatively local (< 80 km), likely due to the deposition of the larger particles from the air over shorter distances and limited wind transportation at near ground level. Overall, our results show that molecular protocols integrated into existing air quality monitoring networks can provide standardized, biodiversity monitoring at relatively low field cost, with potential for broad scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.