Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40456779›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Willow silvopastoral systems as a strategy to reduce methane emissions while maintaining cattle performance.

Joshua Philip Thompson, Sokratis Stergiadis, Omar Cristobal Carballo, Wayne E Zeller, Tianhai Yan, Francis Lively, John Gilliland, Rudra N Purusottam, Sharon Huws, Katerina Theodoridou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Can seaweed mitigate methane from cows on a global scale?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joshua Philip ThompsonInstitute of Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Sokratis StergiadisSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Omar Cristobal CarballoSustainable Livestock Systems Branch, Agri Food and Biosciences Institute, County Down, Hillsborough, UK.
Wayne E ZellerUSDA-ARS, U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center USA, Madison, UK.
Tianhai YanSustainable Livestock Systems Branch, Agri Food and Biosciences Institute, County Down, Hillsborough, UK.
Francis LivelySustainable Livestock Systems Branch, Agri Food and Biosciences Institute, County Down, Hillsborough, UK.
John GillilandSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Rudra N PurusottamSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Sharon HuwsInstitute of Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Katerina TheodoridouInstitute of Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. k.theodoridou@qub.ac.uk.

Funding

United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) as part of the Doctoral Training Partnership Food Biosystems: biological processes across the Agri-Food system from pre-farm to post-fork BB/T008776/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Willow (Salix sp.) is a common tree used in agroforestry for biofuel production and contains condensed tannins (CTs). This study investigated, for the first time, the feasibility of using willow grazing in a silvopastoral system to improve ruminant productivity while minimizing environmental impact. The specific objectives were to: (a) characterise willow's CTs, and (b) explore their effect on methane emissions and animal performance. Twenty growing castrated beef cattle (steers) were used in a two-treatment study comparing grazing systems: a willow fodder mix with a grass understory (WFG) and perennial ryegrass grazing (PRG). The study was conducted using a two-period Latin square design. Steers grazing on WFG had an average daily CT intake of 617 g/d. For CTs, the mean degree of polymerisation was 10.6, and the ratio of procyanidin to prodelphinidin was 28.9:71.2. No significant differences were observed between the two treatments in metabolisable energy intake (P = 0.0728), nitrogen intake (P = 0.844), forage dry matter intake (P = 0.100), or total dry matter intake (P = 0.0591). A 27% reduction in methane production was observed for the WFG treatment relative to PRG (P < 0.001; 173 vs. 273 g/d). This study is the first to provide evidence of the significant potential that willow could have in sustainable livestock production systems worldwide.

Indexed as

Animal FeedMethaneSalixAnimalsCattleMaleProanthocyanidinsMethaneProanthocyanidinsCattleCondensed tanninsMethanePerformanceSilvopastureWillow

Identifiers

PMID40456779
PMCPMC12130242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.