Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40456771›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Cell-cell communication-mediated cell-type-specific parent-of-origin effects in mammals.

Jia-Jin Wu, Enqin Zheng, Langqing Liu, Jianping Quan, Donglin Ruan, Zekai Yao, Jifei Yang, Xuehua Li, Shiyuan Wang, Ming Yang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jia-Jin Wu *State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2780-8272
Enqin Zheng *State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Langqing Liu *State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4868-087X
Jianping QuanState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7064-080X
Donglin RuanState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zekai YaoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jifei YangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xuehua LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shiyuan WangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ming YangZhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zebin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Meng LinState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zheng XuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zicong LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Gengyuan CaiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. cgy0415@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3773-4713
Jie YangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. jieyang2012@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7031-2160
Zhenfang WuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, and College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. wzfemail@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5586-6771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is manifested as monoallelic expression of genes according to parental origin, which is closely linked to mammalian placentation and human diseases. Yet, it is unclear how genomic imprinting evolves in different cell types. Here we generate a single-nucleus transcriptomic landscape of mammalian placental development, identifying 5 major cell types and 14 trophoblast subtypes. By developing a framework for integrating the datasets of single-nucleus transcriptome and whole-genome variations from reciprocal crosses of the genetically distinct Duroc and Lulai pig breeds, we construct a cell-type-specific genomic imprinting landscape, uncovering 118 candidate imprinted genes. We expand the mammalian imprinting gene catalog by identifying 97 previously uncharacterized imprinted candidates. Nearly 75% of imprinted candidates exhibit a cell-type- and developmental-stage-dependent manner. Through cross-species analysis, we show that cell-cell communication, especially the integration and modification of signaling pathways into a cell-type-specific autocrine network, drives biased allelic expression of imprinted genes in pigs, mice, and humans. Our findings provide genetic and molecular insights into parent-of-origin effects on gene expression, offering an in-depth understanding of genomic imprinting in mammals.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationGenomic ImprintingAllelesAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMammalsMicePlacentaPlacentationPregnancySwineTranscriptomeTrophoblasts

Identifiers

PMID40456771
PMCPMC12130478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.