ArticleNature communications2025
Cell-cell communication-mediated cell-type-specific parent-of-origin effects in mammals.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A longitudinal single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of bovine placentation reveals dynamic cellular hierarchies and regulatory programs.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Challenges and emerging strategies for genome-wide evaluation of loss of imprinting in cancer.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- The tango of immune and neural cells: orchestrating neuroinflammation mediated brain disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is manifested as monoallelic expression of genes according to parental origin, which is closely linked to mammalian placentation and human diseases. Yet, it is unclear how genomic imprinting evolves in different cell types. Here we generate a single-nucleus transcriptomic landscape of mammalian placental development, identifying 5 major cell types and 14 trophoblast subtypes. By developing a framework for integrating the datasets of single-nucleus transcriptome and whole-genome variations from reciprocal crosses of the genetically distinct Duroc and Lulai pig breeds, we construct a cell-type-specific genomic imprinting landscape, uncovering 118 candidate imprinted genes. We expand the mammalian imprinting gene catalog by identifying 97 previously uncharacterized imprinted candidates. Nearly 75% of imprinted candidates exhibit a cell-type- and developmental-stage-dependent manner. Through cross-species analysis, we show that cell-cell communication, especially the integration and modification of signaling pathways into a cell-type-specific autocrine network, drives biased allelic expression of imprinted genes in pigs, mice, and humans. Our findings provide genetic and molecular insights into parent-of-origin effects on gene expression, offering an in-depth understanding of genomic imprinting in mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.