Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40456738›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Scalable earthquake magnitude prediction using spatio-temporal data and model versioning.

Rahul Singh, Bholanath Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rahul SinghMaulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India. rahulit0606@gmail.com.
Bholanath RoyMaulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earthquake magnitude prediction is critical for natural calamity prevention and mitigation, significantly reducing casualties and economic losses through timely warnings. This study introduces a novel approach by using spatio-temporal data from seismic records obtained from the Indian government seismology department and weather data sourced via VisualCrossing to predict earthquake magnitudes. By integrating environmental and seismic variables, the study explores their interrelationships to enhance predictive capabilities. The proposed framework incorporates a machine learning operations (MLOps)-driven pipeline using MLflow for automated data ingestion, preprocessing, model versioning, tracking, and deployment. This novel integration ensures adaptability to evolving datasets and facilitates dynamic model selection for optimal performance. Multiple machine learning algorithms, including Gradient Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), XGBoost, and Random Forest, are evaluated on dataset sizes of 20%, 35%, 65%, and 100%, with performance metrics such as Mean Absolute Error, Mean Squared Error, Root Mean Squared Error, and R

Indexed as

Disaster predictionEarthquake magnitudeMachine learningMachine learning operations (MLOps)MLflowSpatio-temporal data

Identifiers

PMID40456738
PMCPMC12130196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.