ArticleBone & joint open2025
Striving to recover - wrist splint or plaster cast : a qualitative study of patients' experience of recovery after a distal radius fracture.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Multidimensional Impact of Traditional Orthopaedic Casting and the Role of Emerging Immobilization Technologies: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: We sought to explore patients' experience of early recovery from a fracture of the wrist (distal radius). This study was nested in the DRAFT-CASP randomized controlled trial (RCT), which explores the effectiveness of two treatment pathways for patients with a fracture of the distal radius that does not require manipulation: a plaster cast which is removed in fracture clinic, versus a wrist splint that patients remove themselves without returning to hospital. Methods: Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 21 adults (mean age 58.2 years (SD 13.96), six male), from eight NHS hospitals, four to ten weeks post injury. Interviews were informed by phenomenology and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: We identified the overarching theme 'striving to recover', which conveys patients' determination to get back to normal after a wrist fracture. To recover, patients needed to be comfortable, to adapt, and to be certain that their wrist was healing. Early in their recovery, they were unable to complete their daily activities, experienced pain, loss of strength, worry, and were cautious about using their wrist. Overall, both treatments were considered acceptable. The splint was advantageous for the freedom and control it provided. The cast was valued for the protection and safety it provided. Both groups required more information and reassurance, but had varied views on the need for follow-up appointments. Conclusion: The splint made life easier for patients and was an acceptable treatment. Patients wanted reassurance that their wrist was healing, but they felt this could be achieved in a variety of ways. Most patients coped without a follow-up appointment. Innovative ways to maximize recovery are required. These include support for patients to, manage their pain and provide comfort, be able to adapt, and feel certain of healing. Sharing patients' experiences may help future patients to make informed treatment and recovery decisions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.