ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Changes in mental health diagnosis and healthcare use in seven European countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2017-21).
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Virtual Organoids (AIVOs).Bioactive materials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the framework of the European Population Health Information Research Infrastructure (PHIRI) project, we analysed the healthcare use for depression and/or anxiety during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Aggregated monthly number of diagnoses were obtained from electronic health records and databases in Austria, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Romania, Wales (UK), and Aragon (Spain) and analysed using the PHIRI federated research infrastructure. Rates of diagnosis, prescriptions and visits to primary care, hospital or emergency department were calculated by 10 000 population. Segmented Poisson regression to estimate changes in outcomes after the COVID-19 pandemic declaration was produced controlling for baseline levels and trends for the period January 2017 to December 2021. Following pandemic declaration, level change of incident diagnoses fell in Romania, Aragon (Spain), and Wales (UK) [log rate -0.853 (95% confidence interval -1.045 to -0.661), -0.338 (-0.434 to -0.242), and -0274 (-0.365 to -0.183), respectively]; level change of visits to primary care decreased in Romania and Wales (UK) [-0.347 (-0.555 to -0.138) and -0.272 (-0.368 to -0.177), respectively], and increased in Latvia [0.065 (0.004-0.126)]; level change for hospital admissions diminished in Latvia, Romania and Wales (UK) [-0.206 (-0.393 to -0.019), -0.947 (-1.143 to -0.752) and -0.116 (-0.202 to -0.030), respectively]; and level change of visits to emergency units fell in Latvia and Romania [-0.290 (-0.429 to -0.151) and -0.865 (-1.040 to -0.690), respectively] and increased in Aragon (Spain) [0.880 (0.259 to 1.502)]. COVID-19 pandemic declaration altered the use of mental health resources. This study highlights the potential use of harmonized data for providing evidence for future pandemic preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.