Observational studyThe Journal of hospital infection2025
Effects of reminders from Sanibit™ electronic hand hygiene system and incentives on hand hygiene compliance: a prospective, four-phased, observational study.
Observational study in The Journal of hospital infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividualized reminders and incentives from automated hand hygiene monitoring systems (AHHMSs) might contribute to significant hand hygiene improvement.
aimTo comprehensively evaluate the implementation of the Sanibit™ AHHMS system in the intensive care unit and the impact of these interventions on hand hygiene compliance in a four-phased, prospective trial at a tertiary care hospital.
methodsThe Sanibit monitoring system was installed in a 10-bed neurological intensive care unit. Phase 1: no reminder, cash incentive. Phase 2a: lights only, cash incentive. Phase 2b: lights + vibrations, cash incentive. Phase 3: no reminder, point system incentive. Phase 4: lights + vibrations, point system incentive.
findingsThe accuracy rate detected by the Sanibit, compared with direct observations, was 85.1%. Phase 2a with lights only and cash incentives achieved the most hand hygiene opportunities in the middle of the week. Phase 4 with lights and vibrations reminders and point system incentives achieved the best in terms of total, full, and partial hand hygiene compliance, while phase 2a with lights only and cash incentives had the highest hand hygiene opportunities. Hand hygiene compliance rates of going-out room events were significantly lower than those of going-in room events for quick in-and-out room, while the opposite held true for long in-and-out room events.
conclusionsHand hygiene opportunities, compliance, and patient contact times varied significantly among different reminders/incentives, individual healthcare workers, day of the week and time of the day. Lights and vibration reminders and point system incentives achieved the best hand hygiene compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.