SynthesisJornal de pediatria
Alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children: a systematic review of efficacy and safety.
Synthesis in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alternative antibiotics and different standard treatment regimens for bacterial meningitis in children, considering the increasing antimicrobial resistance and the need for adapted therapeutic options. To justify the use of alternative antibiotics, the authors analyzed the specific efficacy of ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem, which showed potential to overcome cases of antimicrobial resistance. DATA SOURCES: A search was performed in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, without data restrictions, including planned clinical trials that compared alternative antibiotics and different standard treatment regimens, such as ceftriaxone, in children with bacterial meningitis. Inclusion criteria include studies reporting cure rates, complications and safety of treatments. SUMMARY OF
resultsAn analysis of 14 studies, totaling 2,014 children, indicated that antibiotics such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem had comparable efficacy and safety to standard treatment regimens. The review showed that, in many cases, alternative regimens and shorter treatment durations could be effective, without significantly increasing complications or mortality.
conclusionThe results suggest that alternatives to standard treatment, such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime and meropenem, are viable and safe options for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. These results help to adapt clinical practices, especially in settings with high antimicrobial resistance and resource limitations, by providing evidence for shorter and equally effective treatment regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.