Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40456044›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2025

Minimally-Invasive Dega Osteotomy in Ambulatory Pediatric Patients With Residual Developmental Dysplasia of the Hips-A Technique and Prospective Case Series.

Saleh AlSaifi, Ali Lari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saleh AlSaifiFrom the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AlRazi National Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait.ORCID 0009-0008-3930-9677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study describes the minimally invasive Dega osteotomy for treating residual acetabular dysplasia in ambulatory pediatric patients. The focus is on assessing the safety, feasibility, and early outcomes of this minimally invasive technique.

methodsA prospective series was conducted in a single tertiary orthopaedic center. The procedure involved an initial examination of hip joint stability using intraoperative arthrography. The surgical procedure involved a small transverse incision distal and lateral to the anterior superior iliac spine, followed by a Dega osteotomy and bone allografting. Variables such as surgical time, blood loss, incision length, and acetabular index were measured.

resultsIn healthy ambulatory patients, 16 osteotomies were performed on 12 patients with an average age of 32 months. The mean incision length was 2.3 cm, average blood loss was 17 mL, and mean surgical time was 21 minutes per side. Preoperative and postoperative acetabular indices averaged 40.3° and 18.6°, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 13 months. No complications were seen in this series.

conclusionThe minimally invasive Dega osteotomy technique is a safe and effective method for treating residual acetabular dysplasia in ambulatory patients. It offers advantages of minimal invasiveness, reduced surgical time, and less blood loss, with outcomes comparable to standard methods. However, further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are necessary to fully establish its efficacy and safety profile.

Indexed as

AcetabulumAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresDevelopmental Dysplasia of the HipMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOsteotomyChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleOperative TimeProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40456044
PMCPMC12107525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.