Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40455998›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Climate warming increases global oceanic dimethyl sulfide emissions.

Sankirna D Joge, Karam Mansour, Rafel Simó, Martí Galí, Nadja Steiner, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Anoop S Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Predicting the Potential Distribution ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Climate warming increases global oceanic dimethyl sulfide emissions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sankirna D JogeIndian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Pune 411008, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9308-9072
Karam MansourItalian National Research Council, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Bologna 40129, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0588-9411
Rafel SimóInstitut de Ciències del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Catalonia 08003, Spain.
Martí GalíInstitut de Ciències del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Catalonia 08003, Spain.
Nadja SteinerInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 4B2, Canada.
Alfonso Saiz-LopezDepartment of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Blas Cabrera, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid 28006, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0060-1581
Anoop S MahajanIndian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Pune 411008, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-5432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oceanic dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is the largest natural source of atmospheric sulfur. DMS is biologically produced in seawater and emitted into the atmosphere, where its oxidation products contribute to aerosol formation with consequences for cloud albedo and the Earth's radiative budget and climate. Climate model projections of how DMS emissions change with global warming are largely uncertain, even contradictory. Here, we use machine-learning models trained with biome-resolved global observations to simulate seawater DMS concentrations (1850 to 2100) using physico-chemical and biological predictors from eight CMIP6 models. The scatter in current projections is largely reduced, and globally averaged seawater DMS concentrations are predicted to decrease in the coming decades. However, global DMS emissions will increase due to rising surface wind speeds and sea surface temperatures which contradicts the current AR6 assessment that the DMS flux will reduce in the future. Concurrence of increasing DMS emissions and declining anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions suggests an increase in the relative importance of DMS to sulfate aerosol formation and its climate cooling impact.

Indexed as

biogeochemistryclimate changedimethyl sulfide

Identifiers

PMID40455998
PMCPMC12167960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.