Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40455919›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

An auditory cortical-striatal circuit supports sound-triggered timing to predict future events.

Harini Suri, Karla Salgado-Puga, Yixuan Wang, Nayomie Allen, Kaitlynn Lane, Kyra Granroth, Alberto Olivei, Nathanial Nass, Gideon Rothschild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Harini SuriDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Karla Salgado-PugaDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Yixuan WangDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Nayomie AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Kaitlynn LaneDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Kyra GranrothDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Alberto OliveiDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Nathanial NassDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Gideon RothschildDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9700-1020

Funding

The neural mechanisms and mnemonic consequences of sound processing during sleepR01NS129874 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ada Eban-Rothschild, Gideon Rothschild · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial aspect of auditory perception is the ability to use sound cues to predict future events and to time actions accordingly. For example, the sound of an approaching vehicle signals when it is safe to cross the street; distinct smartphone notification sounds reflect a call that needs to be answered within a few seconds, or a text that can be read later. Other animals similarly use sounds to plan, time and execute behaviors such as hunting, evading predation and tending to offspring. However, the neural mechanisms that underlie sound-guided prediction of upcoming salient event timing are not well understood. To address this gap, we employed an appetitive sound-triggered reward time prediction behavior in head-fixed mice. We find that mice trained on this task reliably estimate the time from a sound cue to upcoming reward on the scale of a few seconds, as demonstrated by learning-dependent well-timed increases in predictive licking for reward. Moreover, mice showed a dramatic impairment in their ability to use sound to predict delayed reward when the auditory cortex was inactivated, demonstrating its causal involvement. To identify the neurophysiological signatures of auditory cortical reward-timing prediction, we recorded local field potentials during learning and performance of this behavior and found that the magnitude of auditory cortical responses to the sound prospectively encoded the duration of the anticipated sound-reward time interval. Next, we explored how and where these sound-triggered time interval prediction signals propagate from the auditory cortex to time and initiate consequent action. We targeted the monosynaptic projections from the auditory cortex to the posterior striatum and found that chemogenetic inactivation of these projections impaired animals' ability to predict sound-triggered delayed reward. Simultaneous neural recordings in the auditory cortex and posterior striatum during task performance revealed coordination of neural activity across these regions during the sound cue predicting the time interval to reward. Collectively, our findings identify an auditory cortical-striatal circuit supporting sound-triggered timing-prediction behaviors.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAuditory PerceptionCorpus StriatumTime PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCuesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRewardSound

Identifiers

PMID40455919
PMCPMC12169527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.