Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40455917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Initial development of the Stress Monitoring and Response Tool (SMART): A holistic measure of stress following trauma.

Emily G Lowery-Gionta, Haley Stritzel, Liana M Matson, Meredith A Bucher, Xinming An, Yinyao Ji, Qinghua Li, Samuel A McLean, Amy B Adler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily G Lowery-GiontaCenter for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9696-5354
Haley StritzelInstitute for Trauma Recovery, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Liana M MatsonCenter for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Meredith A BucherInstitute for Trauma Recovery, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Xinming AnDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Yinyao JiInstitute for Trauma Recovery, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Qinghua LiInstitute for Trauma Recovery, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Samuel A McLeanInstitute for Trauma Recovery, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9482-3582
Amy B AdlerCenter for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0886-5530

Funding

Longitudinal Assessment of Post-traumatic SyndromesU01MH110925 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KESSLER, RONALD C, KOENEN, KARESTAN C · 2016 to 2020
$25.8M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH110925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the immediate aftermath of trauma exposure, individuals may experience an acute stress reaction (ASR). ASRs may be transient but for individuals operating in high-stakes occupations, these reactions can potentially endanger themselves and those around them. Thus, a better understanding of ASRs could facilitate development of early interventions that help prevent longer-term sequelae. Although existing measures (e.g., PCL-5, CAPS-5) target symptoms that occur in the weeks following trauma, they do not encompass the range of ASR symptoms identified in emerging research. Using data from a large-scale study conducted across emergency departments in the United States, we employed confirmatory factor analysis to identify survey items that sensitively assess ASR symptoms during the peri- and post-trauma phases. These analyses identified 23 core items that are appropriate for administration both immediately following trauma exposure and at later timepoints, as well as 11 supplementary items that can be added to the core items for assessment at later timepoints. Collectively, these items constitute the Stress Monitoring and Response Tool (SMART). Both the SMART Core Scale and the combined SMART Core Scale with Supplemental Items demonstrate good convergent and concurrent validity with several other measures of mental health, physical health, somatic symptoms, pain, and functioning. In addition, the SMART scale remains moderately-to-strongly correlated with multiple measures of symptoms and functional impairment at three months post-trauma. Consequently, the SMART can be used to assess individuals in clinical settings, predict trajectories of recovery, and inform tailoring of interventions across time. Future studies should be conducted to assess the potential utility of the SMART as a decision aid in high-intensity occupational contexts.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticStress, PsychologicalWounds and InjuriesAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40455917
PMCPMC12129313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.