Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40455868›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Simulation study to evaluate when Plasmode simulation is superior to parametric simulation in comparing classification methods on high-dimensional data.

Marieke Stolte, Nicholas Schreck, Alla Slynko, Maral Saadati, Axel Benner, Jörg Rahnenführer, Andrea Bommert, topic group “High-dimensional data” (TG9) of the STRATOS Initiative

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marieke StolteDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0711-6789
Nicholas SchreckDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Alla SlynkoDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Maral SaadatiDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Axel BennerDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Jörg RahnenführerDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Andrea BommertDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
topic group “High-dimensional data” (TG9) of the STRATOS Initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation studies, especially neutral comparison studies, are crucial for evaluating and comparing statistical methods as they investigate whether methods work as intended and can guide an appropriate method choice. Typically, the term simulation refers to parametric simulation, i.e. computer experiments using pseudo-random numbers. For these, the full data-generating process (DGP) and outcome-generating model (OGM) are known within the simulation. However, the specification of realistic DGPs might be difficult in practice leading to oversimplified assumptions. The problem is more severe for higher-dimensional data as the number of parameters to specify typically increases with the number of variables in the data. Plasmode simulation, which is a combination of resampling covariates from a real-life dataset from the DGP of interest together with a specified OGM is often claimed to solve this problem since no explicit specification of the DGP is necessary. However, this claim is not well supported by empirical results. Here, parametric and Plasmode simulations are compared in the context of a method comparison study for binary classification methods. We focus on studies conducted with some specific data type or application in mind whose true, unknown data-generating mechanism is mimicked. The performance of Plasmode and parametric comparison studies for estimating classifier performance is compared as well as their ability to reproduce the true method ranking. The influence of misspecifications of the DGP on the results of parametric simulation and of misspecifications of the OGM on the results of parametric and Plasmode simulation are investigated. Moreover, different resampling strategies are compared for Plasmode comparison studies. The study finds that misspecifications of the DGP and OGM negatively influence the ability of the comparison studies to estimate the classification performances and method rankings. The best choice of the resampling strategy in Plasmode simulation depends on the concrete scenario.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40455868
PMCPMC12129352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.